No-Regret Learning with Unbounded Losses: The Case of Logarithmic Pooling
Eric Neyman, Tim Roughgarden
Abstract
For each of time steps, experts report probability distributions over outcomes; we wish to learn to aggregate these forecasts in a way that attains a no-regret guarantee. We focus on the fundamental and practical aggregation method known as logarithmic pooling -- a weighted average of log odds -- which is in a certain sense the optimal choice of pooling method if one is interested in minimizing log loss (as we take to be our loss function). We consider the problem of learning the best set of parameters (i.e. expert weights) in an online adversarial setting. We assume (by necessity) that the adversarial choices of outcomes and forecasts are consistent, in the sense that experts report calibrated forecasts. Imposing this constraint creates a (to our knowledge) novel semi-adversarial setting in which the adversary retains a large amount of flexibility. In this setting, we present an algorithm based on online mirror descent that learns expert weights in a way that attains expected regret as compared with the best weights in hindsight.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a6e55a0d-83c7-45a6-bc4d-a95a9a5892f3Cited by top-tier papers2
- ANCHOR: Abductive Network Construction with Hierarchical Orchestration for Reliable Probability Inference in Large Language ModelsWentao Qiu, Guanran Luo, Zhongquan Jian, Jingqi Gao et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
- Sample Complexity of Forecast AggregationTao Lin, Yiling ChenNeurIPS 2023
Builds on3
- AugMix: A Simple Data Processing Method to Improve Robustness and UncertaintyDan Hendrycks, Norman Mu, Ekin Dogus Cubuk, Barret Zoph et al.ICLR 2020 · 1,572 citations
- Revisiting the Calibration of Modern Neural NetworksMatthias Minderer, Josip Djolonga, Rob Romijnders, Frances Hubis et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 633 citations
- When Does Optimizing a Proper Loss Yield Calibration?Jaroslaw Blasiok, Parikshit Gopalan, Lunjia Hu, Preetum NakkiranNeurIPS 2023 · 48 citations
Related papers
- High-Dimensional Calibration from Swap RegretMaxwell Fishelson, Noah Golowich, Mehryar Mohri, Jon SchneiderNeurIPS 2025 · 16 citations
- On Robust Streaming for Learning with Experts: Algorithms and Lower BoundsDavid P. Woodruff, Fred Zhang, Samson ZhouNeurIPS 2023 · 7 citations
- No-Regret Online Prediction with Strategic ExpertsOmid Sadeghi, Maryam FazelNeurIPS 2023 · 2 citations
- Prediction with Corrupted Expert AdviceIdan Amir, Idan Attias, Tomer Koren, Yishay Mansour et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 49 citations
- Minimax Optimal Quantile and Semi-Adversarial Regret via Root-Logarithmic RegularizersJeffrey Negrea, Blair L. Bilodeau, Nicolò Campolongo, Francesco Orabona et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 9 citations
