ReviseMate: Exploring Contextual Support for Digesting STEM Paper Reviews
Yuansong Xu, Shuhao Zhang, Yijie Fan, Shaohan Shi, Zhenhui Peng, Quan Li
Abstract
Fig. 1. An example scenario illustrating how authors can effectively digest reviews of their papers using ReviseMate: (A) The author encounters challenges when attempting to comprehend the feedback provided by reviewers for his paper. (B) In search of assistance, the author turns to ReviseMate. By leveraging the system's capabilities in the analysis process, including comment extraction, aligning comments with relevant paragraphs in the original paper, comment categorization, and the integration of analyzed information, the author successfully engages in a contextual and tailored review text digestion process. This figure was created with the collaboration of an AI-powered image generation tool Midjourney.
Effectively assimilating and integrating reviewer feedback is crucial for researchers seeking to refine their papers and handle potential rebuttal phases in academic venues. However, traditional review digestion processes present challenges such as time consumption, reading fatigue, and the requisite for comprehensive analytical skills. Prior research on review analysis often provides theoretical guidance with limited targeted support. Additionally, general text comprehension tools overlook the intricate nature of comprehensively understanding reviews and lack contextual assistance. To bridge this gap, we formulated research questions to explore the authors' concerns and methods for enhancing comprehension during the review digestion * This work was done when Yijie Fan was an undergraduate student at ShanghaiTech University.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a6df03d9-2d7a-44a0-8fba-ebaeb5b8e70aBuilds on14
- BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and ComprehensionMike Lewis, Yinhan Liu, Naman Goyal, Marjan Ghazvininejad et al.ACL 2020 · 1,224 citations
- To Trust or to Think: Cognitive Forcing Functions Can Reduce Overreliance on AI in AI-assisted Decision-makingZana Buçinca, Maja Barbara Malaya, Krzysztof Z. GajosCSCW 2021 · 962 citations
- Does the Whole Exceed its Parts? The Effect of AI Explanations on Complementary Team PerformanceGagan Bansal, Tongshuang Wu, Joyce Zhou, Raymond Fok et al.CHI 2021 · 713 citations
- Understanding the Effect of Out-of-distribution Examples and Interactive Explanations on Human-AI Decision MakingHan Liu, Vivian Lai, Chenhao TanCSCW 2021 · 96 citations
- Augmenting Scientific Papers with Just-in-Time, Position-Sensitive Definitions of Terms and SymbolsAndrew Head, Kyle Lo, Dongyeop Kang, Raymond Fok et al.CHI 2021 · 91 citations
Related papers
- Re3: A Holistic Framework and Dataset for Modeling Collaborative Document RevisionQian Ruan, Ilia Kuznetsov, Iryna GurevychACL 2024
- CrossLit: Connecting Visual and Textual Sensemaking for Literature ReviewKiroong Choe, Eunhye Kim, Min-Hyeong Kim, Suyeon Hwang et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Beyond the Page: Enriching Academic Paper Reading with Social Media DiscussionsRun Huang, Anna Katherine Zhao, Zeinabsadat Saghi, Sadra Sabouri et al.UIST 2025 · 2 citations
- Passages: Interacting with Text Across DocumentsHan L. Han, Junhang Yu, Raphael Bournet, Alexandre Ciorascu et al.CHI 2022 · 36 citations
- Relatedly: Scaffolding Literature Reviews with Existing Related Work SectionsSrishti Palani, Aakanksha Naik, Doug Downey, Amy X. Zhang et al.CHI 2023 · 37 citations
