Rewiring What-to-Watch-Next Recommendations to Reduce Radicalization Pathways
Francesco Fabbri, Yanhao Wang, Francesco Bonchi, Carlos Castillo, Michael Mathioudakis
Abstract
Recommender systems typically suggest to users content similar to what they consumed in the past. If a user happens to be exposed to strongly polarized content, she might subsequently receive recommendations which may steer her towards more and more radicalized content, eventually being trapped in what we call a "radicalization pathway". In this paper, we study the problem of mitigating radicalization pathways using a graph-based approach. Specifically, we model the set of recommendations of a "what-to-watch-next" recommender as a 𝑑-regular directed graph where nodes correspond to content items, links to recommendations, and paths to possible user sessions. We measure the "segregation" score of a node representing radicalized content as the expected length of a random walk from that node to any node representing non-radicalized content. High segregation scores are associated to larger chances to get users trapped in radicalization pathways. Hence, we define the problem of reducing the prevalence of radicalization pathways by selecting a small number of edges to "rewire", so to minimize the maximum of segregation scores among all radicalized nodes, while maintaining the relevance of the recommendations. We prove that the problem of finding the optimal set of recommendations to rewire is NP-hard and NP-hard to approximate within any factor. Therefore, we turn our attention to heuristics, and propose an efficient yet effective greedy algorithm based on the absorbing random walk theory. Our experiments on real-world datasets in the context of video and news recommendations confirm the effectiveness of our proposal. CCS CONCEPTS • Information systems → Web applications; • Theory of computation → Random walks and Markov chains.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a6c773be-fb46-423f-80cc-c95436d9a3a9Cited by top-tier papers7
- Reducing Exposure to Harmful Content via Graph RewiringCorinna Coupette, Stefan Neumann, Aristides GionisKDD 2023 · 9 citations
- Local Centrality Minimization with Quality GuaranteesAtsushi Miyauchi, Lorenzo Severini, Francesco BonchiWWW 2024 · 5 citations
- Minimizing Hitting Time between Disparate Groups with Shortcut EdgesFlorian Adriaens, Honglian Wang, Aristides GionisKDD 2023 · 4 citations
- Harm Mitigation in Recommender Systems under User Preference DynamicsJerry Chee, Shankar Kalyanaraman, Sindhu Kiranmai Ernala, Udi Weinsberg et al.KDD 2024 · 3 citations
- Gateway Entities in Problematic TrajectoriesXi Leslie Chen, Abhratanu Dutta, Sindhu Kiranmai Ernala, Stratis Ioannidis et al.WWW 2023 · 1 citation
Builds on2
Related papers
- Discovering Polarization Niches via Dense Subgraphs with Attractors and RepulsersAdriano Fazzone, Tommaso Lanciano, Riccardo Denni, Charalampos E. Tsourakakis et al.VLDB 2022 · 17 citations
- Co-exposure Maximization in Online Social NetworksSijing Tu, Çigdem Aslay, Aristides GionisNeurIPS 2020 · 19 citations
- Random Walks with Erasure: Diversifying Personalized Recommendations on Social and Information NetworksBibek Paudel, Abraham BernsteinWWW 2021 · 22 citations
- Preference Amplification in Recommender SystemsDimitris Kalimeris, Smriti Bhagat, Shankar Kalyanaraman, Udi WeinsbergKDD 2021 · 24 citations
- Minimizing Polarization and Disagreement in Social Networks via Link RecommendationLiwang Zhu, Qi Bao, Zhongzhi ZhangNeurIPS 2021 · 68 citations
