Estimation of Reliable Proposal Quality for Temporal Action Detection
Junshan Hu, Chaoxu Guo, Liansheng Zhuang, Biao Wang, Tiezheng Ge, Yuning Jiang, Houqiang Li
Abstract
Temporal action detection (TAD) aims to locate and recognize the actions in an untrimmed video. Anchor-free methods have made remarkable progress which mainly formulate TAD into two tasks: classification and localization using two separate branches. This paper reveals the temporal misalignment between the two tasks hindering further progress. To address this, we propose a new method that gives insights into moment and region perspectives simultaneously to align the two tasks by acquiring reliable proposal quality. For the moment perspective, Boundary Evaluate Module (BEM) is designed which focuses on local appearance and motion evolvement to estimate boundary quality and adopts a multi-scale manner to deal with varied action durations. For the region perspective, we introduce Region Evaluate Module (REM) which uses a new and efficient sampling method for proposal feature representation containing more contextual information compared with point feature to refine category score and proposal boundary. The proposed B oundary Evaluate Module and R egion E valuate M odule (BREM) are generic, and they can be easily integrated with other anchor-free TAD methods to achieve superior performance. In our experiments, BREM is combined with two different frameworks and improves the performance on THUMOS14 by 3.6% and 1.0% respectively, reaching a new state-of-the-art (63.6% average mAP). Meanwhile, a competitive result of 36.2% average mAP is achieved on ActivityNet-1.3 with the consistent improvement of BREM. The codes are released at ://github.com/Junshan233/BREM.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a65d5296-b2ae-43f5-bb30-c648bf104925Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on12
- FCOS: Fully Convolutional One-Stage Object DetectionZhi Tian, Chunhua Shen, Hao Chen, Tong HeICCV 2019 · 6,042 citations
- SlowFast Networks for Video RecognitionChristoph Feichtenhofer, Haoqi Fan, Jitendra Malik, Kaiming HeICCV 2019 · 4,104 citations
- Frozen in Time: A Joint Video and Image Encoder for End-to-End RetrievalMax Bain, Arsha Nagrani, Gül Varol, Andrew ZissermanICCV 2021 · 1,550 citations
- BMN: Boundary-Matching Network for Temporal Action Proposal GenerationTianwei Lin, Xiao Liu, Xin Li, Errui Ding et al.ICCV 2019 · 709 citations
- Graph Convolutional Networks for Temporal Action LocalizationRunhao Zeng, Wenbing Huang, Chuang Gan, Mingkui Tan et al.ICCV 2019 · 536 citations
Related papers
- Learning Salient Boundary Feature for Anchor-free Temporal Action LocalizationChuming Lin, Chengming Xu, Donghao Luo, Yabiao Wang et al.CVPR 2021
- RefineTAD: Learning Proposal-free Refinement for Temporal Action DetectionYue Feng, Zhengye Zhang, Rong Quan, Limin Wang et al.ACM MM 2023 · 8 citations
- Dual DETRs for Multi-Label Temporal Action DetectionYuhan Zhu, Guozhen Zhang, Jing Tan, Gangshan Wu et al.CVPR 2024 · 25 citations
- DCAN: Improving Temporal Action Detection via Dual Context AggregationGuo Chen, Yin-Dong Zheng, Limin Wang, Tong LuAAAI 2022 · 86 citations
- Progressive Boundary Refinement Network for Temporal Action DetectionQinying Liu, Zilei WangAAAI 2020 · 156 citations
