Can MLLMs Understand the Deep Implication Behind Chinese Images?
Chenhao Zhang, Xi Feng, Yuelin Bai, Xeron Du, Jinchang Hou, Kaixin Deng, Guangzeng Han, Qinrui Li, Bingli Wang, Jiaheng Liu, Xingwei Qu, Yifei Zhang
Abstract
As the capabilities of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) improve, the need for higher-order evaluation of them is increasing. However, there is a lack of work evaluating MLLM for higher-order perception and understanding of Chinese visual content. To address this, we introduce the CII-Bench, which aims to assess MLLMs' such capabilities for Chinese images. To ensure the authenticity of the Chinese context, images in CII-Bench are sourced from the Chinese Internet and manually reviewed, with corresponding answers also manually crafted. Additionally, CII-Bench incorporates images that represent Chinese traditional culture, such as famous Chinese traditional paintings, which can deeply reflect the model's understanding of Chinese traditional culture. Through experiments on multiple MLLMs using CII-Bench, significant findings emerged. There is a large gap between MLLMs and humans in performance. The highest MLLM accuracy is 64.4%, while the human average is 78.2% and the peak is 81.0%. MLLMs perform poorly on traditional culture images, indicating limitations in understanding high-level semantics and lacking a deep knowledge base of Chinese traditional culture. Moreover, most models have higher accuracy when image emotion hints are added to the prompts. We believe CII-Bench will help MLLMs better understand Chinese semantics and specific images, and move forward the development of expert artificial general intelligence (AGI). Our project is publicly available at https://cii-bench.github.io/ .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a64f6035-1a0d-4177-8ff4-689092daf4ebBuilds on10
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question AnsweringPan Lu, Swaroop Mishra, Tanglin Xia, Liang Qiu et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 2,727 citations
- Cambrian-1: A Fully Open, Vision-Centric Exploration of Multimodal LLMsPeter Tong, Ellis Brown, Penghao Wu, Sanghyun Woo et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 1,004 citations
- CogVLM: Visual Expert for Pretrained Language ModelsWeihan Wang, Qingsong Lv, Wenmeng Yu, Wenyi Hong et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 858 citations
- MMMU: A Massive Multi-Discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGIXiang Yue, Yuansheng Ni, Tianyu Zheng, Kai Zhang et al.CVPR 2024 · 213 citations
Related papers
- MCS-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Multimodal Large Language Models in Chinese Classical StudiesYang Liu, Jiahuan Cao, Hiuyi Cheng, Yongxin Shi et al.ACL 2025
- Culture In a Frame: C3B as a Comic-Based Benchmark for Multimodal Culturally AwarenessYuchen Song, Andong Chen, Wenxin Zhu, Kehai Chen et al.ICLR 2026 · 3 citations
- EEmo-Bench: A Benchmark for Multi-modal Large Language Models on Image Evoked Emotion AssessmentLancheng Gao, Ziheng Jia, Yunhao Zeng, Wei Sun et al.ACM MM 2025 · 2 citations
- Do MLLMs Capture How Interfaces Guide User Behavior? A Benchmark for Multimodal UI/UX Design UnderstandingJaehyun Jeon, Min Soo Kim, Janghan Yoon, Sumin Shim et al.ACL 2026 · 1 citation
- Benchmarking Large Vision-Language Models on CFMME: A Comprehensive Chinese Financial Multimodal Evaluation DatasetQian Chen, Xianyin Zhang, Yanzhi Liu, Lifan Guo et al.ACL 2026
