Online Control of the False Coverage Rate and False Sign Rate
Asaf Weinstein, Aaditya Ramdas
Abstract
The false coverage rate (FCR) is the expected ratio of number of constructed confidence intervals (CIs) that fail to cover their respective parameters to the total number of constructed CIs. Procedures for FCR control exist in the offline setting, but none so far have been designed with the online setting in mind. In the online setting, there is an infinite sequence of fixed unknown parameters ordered by time. At each step, we see independent data that is informative about , and must immediately make a decision whether to report a CI for or not. If is selected for coverage, the task is to determine how to construct a CI for such that for any . A straightforward solution is to construct at each step a level conditional CI. In this paper, we present a novel solution to the problem inspired by online false discovery rate (FDR) algorithms, which only requires the statistician to be able to construct a marginal CI at any given level. Apart from the fact that marginal CIs are usually simpler to construct than conditional ones, the marginal procedure has an important qualitative advantage over the conditional solution, namely, it allows selection to be determined by the candidate CI itself. We take advantage of this to offer solutions to some online problems which have not been addressed before. For example, we show that our general CI procedure can be used to devise online sign-classification procedures that control the false sign rate (FSR). In terms of power and length of the constructed CIs, we demonstrate that the two approaches have complementary strengths and weaknesses using simulations. Last, all of our methodology applies equally well to online FCR control for prediction intervals, having particular implications for assumption-free selective conformal inference.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers2
- Derandomized novelty detection with FDR control via conformal e-valuesMeshi Bashari, Amir Epstein, Yaniv Romano, Matteo SesiaNeurIPS 2023 · 28 citations
- Error-quantified Conformal Inference for Time SeriesJunxi Wu, Dongjian Hu, Yajie Bao, Shu-Tao Xia et al.ICLR 2025
Related papers
- Online Conformal Selection with Accept-to-Reject ChangesKangdao Liu, Huajun Xi, Chi Man Vong, Hongxin WeiAAAI 2026 · 2 citations
- Online Conformal Prediction with Efficiency GuaranteesVaidehi SrinivasSODA 2026
- Real-Time Selection Under General Constraints via Predictive InferenceYuyang Huo, Lin Lu, Haojie Ren, Changliang ZouNeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation
- False Coverage Proportion Control for Conformal PredictionAlexandre Blain, Bertrand Thirion, Pierre NeuvialICML 2025
- Distribution-informed Online Conformal PredictionDongjian Hu, Junxi Wu, Shu-Tao Xia, Changliang ZouICLR 2026 · 2 citations
