Are You Going to Answer That? Measuring User Responses to Anti-Robocall Application Indicators
Imani N. Sherman, Jasmine D. Bowers, Keith McNamara Jr., Juan E. Gilbert, Jaime Ruiz, Patrick Traynor
Abstract
Robocalls are inundating phone users. These automated calls allow for attackers to reach massive audiences with scams ranging from credential hijacking to unnecessary IT support in a largely untraceable fashion. In response, many applications have been developed to alert mobile phone users of incoming robocalls. However, how well these applications communicate risk with their users is not well understood. In this paper, we identify common real-time security indicators used in the most popular anti-robocall applications. Using focus groups and user testing, we first identify which of these indicators most effectively alert users of danger. We then demonstrate that the most powerful indicators can reduce the likelihood that users will answer such calls by as much as 43%. Unfortunately, our evaluation also shows that attackers can eliminate the gains provided by such indicators using a small amount of targetspecific information (e.g., a known phone number). In so doing, we demonstrate that anti-robocall indicators could benefit from significantly increased attention from the research community.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a61eac78-13d6-4b3d-901b-8e80677eb3a0Cited by top-tier papers4
- Jäger: Automated Telephone Call TracebackDavid Adei, Varun Madathil, Sathvik Prasad, Bradley Reaves et al.CCS 2024 · 2 citations
- (Blind) Users Really Do Heed Aural Telephone Scam WarningsFilipo Sharevski, Jennifer Vander Loop, Bill Evans, Alexander PonticelloS&P 2025
- Characterizing Robocalls with Multiple Vantage PointsSathvik Prasad, Aleksandr Nahapetyan, Bradley ReavesS&P 2025
- Combating Robocalls with Phone Virtual Assistant Mediated InteractionSharbani Pandit, Krishanu Sarker, Roberto Perdisci, Mustaque Ahamad et al.USENIX Security 2023
Builds on9
- Why Do Developers Get Password Storage Wrong?: A Qualitative Usability StudyAlena Naiakshina, Anastasia Danilova, Christian Tiefenau, Marco Herzog et al.CCS 2017 · 146 citations
- Dial One for Scam: A Large-Scale Analysis of Technical Support ScamsNajmeh Miramirkhani, Oleksii Starov, Nick NikiforakisNDSS 2017 · 116 citations
- SoK: Everyone Hates Robocalls: A Survey of Techniques Against Telephone SpamHuahong Tu, Adam Doupé, Ziming Zhao, Gail-Joon AhnS&P 2016 · 90 citations
- Sending Out an SMS: Characterizing the Security of the SMS Ecosystem with Public GatewaysBradley Reaves, Nolen Scaife, Dave Tian, Logan Blue et al.S&P 2016 · 68 citations
- Users Really Do Answer Telephone ScamsHuahong Tu, Adam Doupé, Ziming Zhao, Gail-Joon AhnUSENIX Security 2019 · 53 citations
Related papers
- Towards Measuring the Effectiveness of Telephony BlacklistsSharbani Pandit, Roberto Perdisci, Mustaque Ahamad, Payas GuptaNDSS 2018 · 36 citations
- Who's Calling? Characterizing Robocalls through Audio and Metadata AnalysisSathvik Prasad, Elijah Robert Bouma-Sims, Athishay Kiran Mylappan, Bradley ReavesUSENIX Security 2020
- Evaluating the Information Security Awareness of Smartphone UsersRon Bitton, Kobi Boymgold, Rami Puzis, Asaf ShabtaiCHI 2020 · 22 citations
- "I'm regretting that I hit run": In-situ Assessment of Potential MalwareBrandon Lit, Edward Crowder, Hassan Khan, Daniel VogelUSENIX Security 2025
- Development, Evaluation, and Implementation of SEQR - a Usable Secure QR Code ScannerMattia Mossano, Maxime Fabian Veit, Tobias Länge, Benjamin Maximilian Berens et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
