LBM: Hierarchical Large Auto-Bidding Model via Reasoning and Acting
Yewen Li, Zhiyi Lyu, Peng Jiang, Qingpeng Cai, Fei Pan, Bo An, Peng Jiang
Abstract
The growing scale of ad auctions on online advertising platforms has intensified competition, making manual bidding impractical and necessitating auto-bidding to help advertisers achieve their economic goals. Current auto-bidding methods have evolved to use offline reinforcement learning or generative methods to optimize bidding strategies, but they can sometimes behave counterintuitively due to the black-box training manner and limited mode coverage of datasets, leading to challenges in understanding task status and generalization in dynamic ad environments. Large language models (LLMs) offer a promising solution by leveraging prior human knowledge and reasoning abilities to improve auto-bidding performance. However, directly applying LLMs to auto-bidding faces difficulties due to the need for precise actions in competitive auctions and the lack of specialized auto-bidding knowledge, which can lead to hallucinations and suboptimal decisions. To address these challenges, we propose a hierarchical Large auto-Bidding Model (LBM) to leverage the reasoning capabilities of LLMs for developing a superior auto-bidding strategy. This includes a high-level LBM-Think model for reasoning and a low-level LBM-Act model for action generation. Specifically, we propose a dual embedding mechanism to efficiently fuse two modalities, including language and numerical inputs, for language-guided training of the LBM-Act; then, we propose an offline reinforcement fine-tuning technique termed GQPO for mitigating the LLM-Think's hallucinations and enhancing decision-making performance without simulation or real-world rollout like previous multi-turn LLM-based methods. Experiments demonstrate the superiority of a generative backbone based on our LBM, especially in an efficient training manner and generalization ability.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a61e189e-d078-455d-8efe-a9198bbb6498Builds on22
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Reflexion: language agents with verbal reinforcement learningNoah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik Narasimhan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,828 citations
- Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement LearningAviral Kumar, Aurick Zhou, George Tucker, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2020 · 2,881 citations
- Decision Transformer: Reinforcement Learning via Sequence ModelingLili Chen, Kevin Lu, Aravind Rajeswaran, Kimin Lee et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 2,557 citations
- Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-LearningIlya Kostrikov, Ashvin Nair, Sergey LevineICLR 2022 · 1,402 citations
Related papers
- DARA: Few-shot Budget Allocation in Online Advertising via In-Context Decision Making with RL-Finetuned LLMsMingxuan Song, Yusen Huo, Bohan Zhou, Shenglin Yin et al.WWW 2026 · 1 citation
- Autobidding Auctions with LLM-Powered CreativesBingzhe Wang, Bowei Zhang, Changyuan Yu, Qi QiICML 2026
- Enhancing Generative Auto-bidding with Offline Reward Evaluation and Policy SearchZhiyu Mou, Yiqin Lv, Miao Xu, Qi Wang et al.ICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- DRIVE: Distributional and Retrieval-Augmented Bidding with Value EvaluationMiduo Cui, Haochen Wang, Shangqin Mao, Xun Yang et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
- EPMD: A Framework for LLM-Enhanced Ad AuctionsBingzhe Wang, Bowei Zhang, Jiarui Gong, Changyuan Yu et al.KDD 2026
