Hypothesis, Verification, and Induction: Grounding Large Language Models with Self-Driven Skill Learning
Shaohui Peng, Xing Hu, Qi Yi, Rui Zhang, Jiaming Guo, Di Huang, Zikang Tian, Ruizhi Chen, Zidong Du, Qi Guo, Yunji Chen, Ling Li
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) show their powerful automatic reasoning and planning capability with a wealth of semantic knowledge about the human world. However, the grounding problem still hinders the applications of LLMs in the real-world environment. Existing studies try to fine-tune the LLM or utilize pre-defined behavior APIs to bridge the LLMs and the environment, which not only costs huge human efforts to customize for every single task but also weakens the generality strengths of LLMs. To autonomously ground the LLM onto the environment, we proposed the Hypothesis, Verification, and Induction (HYVIN) framework to automatically and progressively ground the LLM with self-driven skill learning. HYVIN first employs the LLM to propose the hypothesis of sub-goals to achieve tasks and then verify the feasibility of the hypothesis via interacting with the underlying environment. Once verified, HYVIN can then learn generalized skills with the guidance of these successfully grounded subgoals. These skills can be further utilized to accomplish more complex tasks that fail to pass the verification phase. Verified in the famous instruction following task set, BabyAI, HYVIN achieves comparable performance in the most challenging tasks compared with imitation learning methods that cost millions of demonstrations, proving the effectiveness of learned skills and showing the feasibility and efficiency of our framework.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a5fc5c1d-7f41-49dc-aad4-0b53420195feCited by top-tier papers2
- Induce, Align, Predict: Zero-Shot Stance Detection via Cognitive Inductive ReasoningBowen Zhang, Jun Ma, Fuqiang Niu, Li Dong et al.AAAI 2026 · 1 citation
- Time-Frequency Token Advantage Clipping for Training Efficient Large Reasoning ModelRong Bao, Bo Wang, Xiao Wang, Hongyu Li et al.AAAI 2026
Builds on10
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Finetuned Language Models are Zero-Shot LearnersJason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y. Zhao, Kelvin Guu et al.ICLR 2022 · 4,966 citations
- PaLM-E: An Embodied Multimodal Language ModelDanny Driess, Fei Xia, Mehdi S. M. Sajjadi, Corey Lynch et al.ICML 2023 · 2,601 citations
- Pre-Trained Language Models for Interactive Decision-MakingShuang Li, Xavier Puig, Chris Paxton, Yilun Du et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 341 citations
Related papers
- Language Models as Zero-Shot Planners: Extracting Actionable Knowledge for Embodied AgentsWenlong Huang, Pieter Abbeel, Deepak Pathak, Igor MordatchICML 2022 · 1,539 citations
- Policy Improvement using Language Feedback ModelsVictor Zhong, Dipendra Misra, Xingdi Yuan, Marc-Alexandre CôtéNeurIPS 2024 · 18 citations
- One Demo Is All It Takes: Planning Domain Derivation with LLMs from A Single DemonstrationJinbang Huang, Yixin Xiao, Zhanguang Zhang, Mark Coates et al.ICLR 2026 · 9 citations
- HypoBootstrap: A Bootstrapping Framework for Inductive ReasoningSi Chen, Yifei Li, Richong ZhangNeurIPS 2025
- Unveiling the Compositional Ability Gap in Vision-Language Reasoning ModelTianle Li, Jihai Zhang, Yongming Rao, Yu ChengNeurIPS 2025 · 17 citations
