SEMA: Simple yet Effective Learning for Multi-Turn Jailbreak Attacks
Mingqian Feng, Xiaodong Liu, Weiwei Yang, Jialin Song, Xuekai Zhu, Chenliang Xu, Jianfeng Gao
Abstract
Multi-turn jailbreaks capture the real threat model for safety-aligned chatbots, where single-turn attacks are merely a special case. Yet existing approaches break under exploration complexity and intent drift. We propose SEMA, a simple yet effective framework that trains a multi-turn attacker without relying on any existing strategies or external data. SEMA comprises two stages. Prefilling self-tuning enables usable rollouts by fine-tuning on non-refusal, well-structured, multi-turn adversarial prompts that are self-generated with a minimal prefix, thereby stabilizing subsequent learning. Reinforcement learning with intent-drift-aware reward trains the attacker to elicit valid multi-turn adversarial prompts while maintaining the same harmful objective. We anchor harmful intent in multi-turn jailbreaks via an intent-drift-aware reward that combines intent alignment, compliance risk, and level of detail. Our open-loop attack regime avoids dependence on victim feedback, unifies single- and multi-turn settings, and reduces exploration complexity. Across multiple datasets, victim models, and jailbreak judges, our method achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) attack success rates (ASR), outperforming all single-turn baselines, manually scripted and template-driven multi-turn baselines, as well as our SFT (Supervised Fine-Tuning) and DPO (Direct Preference Optimization) variants. For instance, SEMA performs an average 80.1% ASR@1 across three closed-source and open-source victim models on AdvBench, 33.9% over prior SOTA. The approach is compact, reproducible, and transfers across targets, providing a stronger and more realistic stress test for large language model (LLM) safety and enabling automatic redteaming to expose and localize failure modes. Our code is available at: https://github.com/microsoft/SEMA.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on17
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust RefusalMantas Mazeika, Long Phan, Xuwang Yin, Andy Zou et al.ICML 2024 · 1,031 citations
- Tree of Attacks: Jailbreaking Black-Box LLMs AutomaticallyAnay Mehrotra, Manolis Zampetakis, Paul Kassianik, Blaine Nelson et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 835 citations
- AutoDAN: Generating Stealthy Jailbreak Prompts on Aligned Large Language ModelsXiaogeng Liu, Nan Xu, Muhao Chen, Chaowei XiaoICLR 2024 · 722 citations
- WildChat: 1M ChatGPT Interaction Logs in the WildWenting Zhao, Xiang Ren, Jack Hessel, Claire Cardie et al.ICLR 2024 · 504 citations
Related papers
- MultiBreak: A Scalable and Diverse Multi-turn Jailbreak Benchmark for Evaluating LLM SafetyJialin Song, Xiaodong Liu, Weiwei Yang, Wuyang Chen et al.ICML 2026 · 5 citations
- MTSA: Multi-turn Safety Alignment for LLMs through Multi-round Red-teamingWeiyang Guo, Jing Li, Wenya Wang, Yu Li et al.ACL 2025
- TROJail: Trajectory-Level Optimization for Multi-Turn Large Language Model Jailbreaks with Process RewardsXiqiao Xiong, Ouxiang Li, Zhuo Liu, Moxin Li et al.ACL 2026 · 7 citations
- Analogy-based Multi-Turn Jailbreak against Large Language ModelsMengjie Wu, Yihao Huang, Zhenjun Lin, Kangjie Chen et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 9 citations
- NEXUS: Network Exploration for eXploiting Unsafe Sequences in Multi-Turn LLM JailbreaksJavad Rafiei Asl, Sidhant Narula, Mohammad GhasemiGol, Eduardo Blanco et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
