Preserving LLM Capabilities through Calibration Data Curation: From Analysis to Optimization
Bowei He, Lihao Yin, Hui-Ling Zhen, Shuqi Liu, Han Wu, Xiaokun Zhang, Mingxuan Yuan, Chen Ma
Abstract
Post-training compression has been a widely employed approach to scale down large language model (LLM) and facilitate efficient inference. In various proposed compression methods, including pruning and quantization, calibration data plays a vital role by informing the weight importance and activation dynamic ranges. However, how calibration data impacts the LLM capability after compression is less explored. Few of the existing works, though recognizing the significance of this study, only investigate the language modeling or commonsense reasoning performance degradation from limited angles, like the data sources or sample amounts. More systematic research is still needed to examine the impacts on different LLM capabilities in terms of compositional properties and domain correspondence of calibration data. In this work, we aim at bridging this gap and further analyze underlying influencing mechanisms from the activation pattern perspective. Especially, we explore the calibration data's impacts on high-level complex reasoning capabilities, like math problem solving and code generation. Delving into the underlying mechanism, we find that the representativeness and diversity in activation space more fundamentally determine the quality of calibration data. Finally, we propose a calibration data curation framework based on such observations and analysis, enhancing the performance of existing post-training compression methods on preserving critical LLM capabilities. Our code is provided in Link.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a579c9c6-ab16-493e-aa75-995bf3189e21Cited by top-tier papers2
- GEMQ: Global Expert-Level Mixed-Precision Quantization for MoE LLMsJianing Deng, Song Wang, Dongwei Wang, Zijie Liu et al.ICML 2026 · 3 citations
- Distributionally Robust Set Representation Learning Under Inference-Time Element CorruptionYankai Chen, Hanrong Zhang, Bowei He, Philip Yu et al.ICML 2026
Builds on21
- WinoGrande: An Adversarial Winograd Schema Challenge at ScaleKeisuke Sakaguchi, Ronan Le Bras, Chandra Bhagavatula, Yejin ChoiAAAI 2020 · 3,037 citations
- PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural LanguageYonatan Bisk, Rowan Zellers, Ronan Le Bras, Jianfeng Gao et al.AAAI 2020 · 2,916 citations
- Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language ModelsAitor Lewkowycz, Anders Andreassen, David Dohan, Ethan Dyer et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 2,039 citations
- SmoothQuant: Accurate and Efficient Post-Training Quantization for Large Language ModelsGuangxuan Xiao, Ji Lin, Mickaël Seznec, Hao Wu et al.ICML 2023 · 1,493 citations
- LLM-Pruner: On the Structural Pruning of Large Language ModelsXinyin Ma, Gongfan Fang, Xinchao WangNeurIPS 2023 · 994 citations
Related papers
- On the Impact of Calibration Data in Post-training Quantization and PruningMiles Williams, Nikolaos AletrasACL 2024
- Beware of Calibration Data for Pruning Large Language ModelsYixin Ji, Yang Xiang, Juntao Li, Qingrong Xia et al.ICLR 2025
- Is C4 Dataset Optimal for Pruning? An Investigation of Calibration Data for LLM PruningAbhinav Bandari, Lu Yin, Cheng-Yu Hsieh, Ajay Jaiswal et al.EMNLP 2024 · 1 citation
- Towards Quantization-Aware Training for Ultra-Low-Bit Reasoning LLMsYasuyuki Okoshi, Hikari Otsuka, Daichi Fujiki, Masato MotomuraICLR 2026
- IMPACT: Importance-Aware Activation Space ReconstructionMd Mokarram Chowdhury, Daniel Agyei Asante, Ernie Chang, Yang LiACL 2026 · 1 citation
