ProcTag: Process Tagging for Assessing the Efficacy of Document Instruction Data
Yufan Shen, Chuwei Luo, Zhaoqing Zhu, Yang Chen, Qi Zheng, Zhi Yu, Jiajun Bu, Cong Yao
Abstract
Recently, large language models (LLMs) and multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have demonstrated promising results on document visual question answering (VQA) task, particularly after training on document instruction datasets. An effective evaluation method for document instruction data is crucial in constructing instruction data with high efficacy, which, in turn, facilitates the training of LLMs and MLLMs for document VQA. However, most existing evaluation methods for instruction data are limited to the textual content of the instructions themselves, thereby hindering the effective assessment of document instruction datasets and constraining their construction. In this paper, we propose ProcTag, a data-oriented method that assesses the efficacy of document instruction data. ProcTag innovatively performs tagging on the execution process of instructions rather than the instruction text itself. By leveraging the diversity and complexity of these tags to assess the efficacy of the given dataset, ProcTag enables selective sampling or filtering of document instructions. Furthermore, DocLayPrompt, a novel semi-structured layout-aware document prompting strategy, is proposed for effectively representing documents. Experiments demonstrate that sampling existing open-sourced and generated document VQA/instruction datasets with ProcTag significantly outperforms current methods for evaluating instruction data. Impressively, with ProcTag-based sampling in the generated document datasets, only 30.5 percent of the document instructions are required to achieve 100 percent efficacy compared to the complete dataset.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a5186e1a-c28e-4da4-8850-6d209c159066Cited by top-tier papers2
- HybriDLA: Hybrid Generation for Document Layout AnalysisYufan Chen, Omar Moured, Ruiping Liu, Junwei Zheng et al.AAAI 2026
- A Simple yet Effective Layout Token in Large Language Models for Document UnderstandingZhaoqing Zhu, Chuwei Luo, Zirui Shao, Feiyu Gao et al.CVPR 2025
Builds on16
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- LayoutLMv3: Pre-training for Document AI with Unified Text and Image MaskingYupan Huang, Tengchao Lv, Lei Cui, Yutong Lu et al.ACM MM 2022 · 606 citations
Related papers
- InstructDoc: A Dataset for Zero-Shot Generalization of Visual Document Understanding with InstructionsRyota Tanaka, Taichi Iki, Kyosuke Nishida, Kuniko Saito et al.AAAI 2024 · 39 citations
- HRVDA: High-Resolution Visual Document AssistantChaohu Liu, Kun Yin, Haoyu Cao, Xinghua Jiang et al.CVPR 2024 · 10 citations
- LayoutLLM: Layout Instruction Tuning with Large Language Models for Document UnderstandingChuwei Luo, Yufan Shen, Zhaoqing Zhu, Qi Zheng et al.CVPR 2024 · 39 citations
- Focus, Don't Prune: Identifying Instruction-Relevant Regions for Information-Rich Image UnderstandingMincheol Kwon, Minseung Lee, Seonga Choi, Miso Choi et al.CVPR 2026 · 2 citations
- Improving Automatic VQA Evaluation Using Large Language ModelsOscar Mañas, Benno Krojer, Aishwarya AgrawalAAAI 2024 · 59 citations
