LExecutor: Learning-Guided Execution
Beatriz Souza, Michael Pradel
Abstract
Executing code is essential for various program analysis tasks, e.g., to detect bugs that manifest through exceptions or to obtain execution traces for further dynamic analysis. However, executing an arbitrary piece of code is often difficult in practice, e.g., because of missing variable definitions, missing user inputs, and missing third-party dependencies. This paper presents LExecutor, a learning-guided approach for executing arbitrary code snippets in an underconstrained way. The key idea is to let a neural model predict missing values that otherwise would cause the program to get stuck, and to inject these values into the execution. For example, LExecutor injects likely values for otherwise undefined variables and likely return values of calls to otherwise missing functions. We evaluate the approach on Python code from popular open-source projects and on code snippets extracted from Stack Overflow. The neural model predicts realistic values with an accuracy between 79.5% and 98.2%, allowing LExecutor to closely mimic real executions. As a result, the approach successfully executes significantly more code than any available technique, such as simply executing the code as-is. For example, executing the open-source code snippets as-is covers only 4.1% of all lines, because the code crashes early on, whereas LExecutor achieves a coverage of 51.6%.
• Software and its engineering → Software testing and debugging.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a4ec1bf8-55d4-4f80-bc95-88afa0efe907Cited by top-tier papers13
- TRACED: Execution-aware Pre-training for Source CodeYangruibo Ding, Benjamin Steenhoek, Kexin Pei, Gail E. Kaiser et al.ICSE 2024 · 29 citations
- Validating AI-Generated Code with Live ProgrammingKasra Ferdowsi, Ruanqianqian (Lisa) Huang, Michael B. James, Nadia Polikarpova et al.CHI 2024 · 27 citations
- A Learning-Based Approach to Static Program SlicingAashish Yadavally, Yi Li, Shaohua Wang, Tien N. NguyenOOPSLA 2024 · 15 citations
- DyPyBench: A Benchmark of Executable Python SoftwareIslem Bouzenia, Bajaj Piyush Krishan, Michael PradelFSE 2024 · 8 citations
- SelfPiCo: Self-Guided Partial Code Execution with LLMsZhipeng Xue, Zhipeng Gao, Shaohua Wang, Xing Hu et al.ISSTA 2024 · 8 citations
Builds on34
- GraphCodeBERT: Pre-training Code Representations with Data FlowDaya Guo, Shuo Ren, Shuai Lu, Zhangyin Feng et al.ICLR 2021 · 1,644 citations
- CodeT5: Identifier-aware Unified Pre-trained Encoder-Decoder Models for Code Understanding and GenerationYue Wang, Weishi Wang, Shafiq R. Joty, Steven C. H. HoiEMNLP 2021 · 1,224 citations
- Coverage-based Greybox Fuzzing as Markov ChainMarcel Böhme, Van-Thuan Pham, Abhik RoychoudhuryCCS 2016 · 1,026 citations
- CoCoNuT: combining context-aware neural translation models using ensemble for program repairThibaud Lutellier, Hung Viet Pham, Lawrence Pang, Yitong Li et al.ISSTA 2020 · 325 citations
- Global Relational Models of Source CodeVincent J. Hellendoorn, Charles Sutton, Rishabh Singh, Petros Maniatis et al.ICLR 2020 · 252 citations
Related papers
- Treefix: Enabling Execution with a Tree of PrefixesBeatriz Souza, Michael PradelICSE 2025
- Feedback-Directed Partial ExecutionIshrak Hayet, Adam Scott, Marcelo d'AmorimISSTA 2024 · 1 citation
- Blended Analysis for Predictive ExecutionYi Li, Hridya Dhulipala, Aashish Yadavally, Xiaokai Rong et al.FSE 2025 · 1 citation
- Predictive Program Slicing via Execution Knowledge-Guided Dynamic Dependence LearningAashish Yadavally, Yi Li, Tien N. NguyenFSE 2024 · 4 citations
- Representing Partial Programs with Blended Abstract SemanticsMaxwell I. Nye, Yewen Pu, Matthew Bowers, Jacob Andreas et al.ICLR 2021 · 23 citations
