Concurrent Shuffle Differential Privacy Under Continual Observation
Jay Tenenbaum, Haim Kaplan, Yishay Mansour, Uri Stemmer
Abstract
We introduce the concurrent shuffle model of differential privacy. In this model we have multiple concurrent shufflers permuting messages from different, possibly overlapping, batches of users. Similarly to the standard (single) shuffle model, the privacy requirement is that the concatenation of all shuffled messages should be differentially private. We study the private continual summation problem (a.k.a. the counter problem) and show that the concurrent shuffle model allows for significantly improved error compared to a standard (single) shuffle model. Specifically, we give a summation algorithm with error with concurrent shufflers on a sequence of length . Furthermore, we prove that this bound is tight for any , even if the algorithm can choose the sizes of the batches adaptively. For shufflers, the resulting error is polylogarithmic, much better than which we show is the smallest possible with a single shuffler. We use our online summation algorithm to get algorithms with improved regret bounds for the contextual linear bandit problem. In particular we get optimal regret with concurrent shufflers.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a49b4315-542e-44eb-b1e1-e47ecc85cbeaCited by top-tier papers3
- On Differentially Private Federated Linear Contextual BanditsXingyu Zhou, Sayak Ray ChowdhuryICLR 2024 · 16 citations
- Time-uniform and Asymptotic Confidence Sequence of Quantile under Local Differential PrivacyLeheng Cai, Qirui Hu, Juntao Sun, Shuyuan WuNeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
- Learning from End User Data with Shuffled Differential Privacy over Kernel DensitiesTal WagnerICLR 2025
Builds on16
- Practical and Private (Deep) Learning Without Sampling or ShufflingPeter Kairouz, Brendan McMahan, Shuang Song, Om Thakkar et al.ICML 2021 · 239 citations
- Is Interaction Necessary for Distributed Private Learning?Adam D. Smith, Abhradeep Thakurta, Jalaj UpadhyayS&P 2017 · 159 citations
- Improved Differential Privacy for SGD via Optimal Private Linear Operators on Adaptive StreamsSergey Denisov, H. Brendan McMahan, John Rush, Adam D. Smith et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 96 citations
- Locally Differentially Private (Contextual) Bandits LearningKai Zheng, Tianle Cai, Weiran Huang, Zhenguo Li et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 76 citations
- Private Reinforcement Learning with PAC and Regret GuaranteesGiuseppe Vietri, Borja Balle, Akshay Krishnamurthy, Zhiwei Steven WuICML 2020 · 70 citations
Related papers
- Shuffle Private Linear Contextual BanditsSayak Ray Chowdhury, Xingyu ZhouICML 2022 · 29 citations
- Private Summation in the Multi-Message Shuffle ModelBorja Balle, James Bell, Adrià Gascón, Kobbi NissimCCS 2020 · 52 citations
- The Price of Differential Privacy under Continual ObservationPalak Jain, Sofya Raskhodnikova, Satchit Sivakumar, Adam D. SmithICML 2023 · 63 citations
- Differentially Private Multi-Armed Bandits in the Shuffle ModelJay Tenenbaum, Haim Kaplan, Yishay Mansour, Uri StemmerNeurIPS 2021 · 37 citations
- Differentially Private Aggregation in the Shuffle Model: Almost Central Accuracy in Almost a Single MessageBadih Ghazi, Ravi Kumar, Pasin Manurangsi, Rasmus Pagh et al.ICML 2021 · 45 citations
