Robust Learning with the Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Criterion
Daniel Greenfeld, Uri Shalit
Abstract
We investigate the use of a non-parametric independence measure, the Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Criterion (HSIC), as a loss-function for learning robust regression and classification models. This loss-function encourages learning models where the distribution of the residuals between the label and the model prediction is statistically independent of the distribution of the instances themselves. This loss-function was first proposed by Mooij et al. (2009) in the context of learning causal graphs. We adapt it to the task of learning for unsupervised covariate shift: learning on a source domain without access to any instances or labels from the unknown target domain, but with the assumption that (the conditional probability of labels given instances) remains the same in the target domain. We show that the proposed loss is expected to give rise to models that generalize well on a class of target domains characterised by the complexity of their description within a reproducing kernel Hilbert space. Experiments on unsupervised covariate shift tasks demonstrate that models learned with the proposed loss-function outperform models learned with standard loss functions, achieving state-of-the-art results on a challenging cell-microscopy unsupervised covariate shift task.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a44c077c-4132-4c6b-89dd-1273d51318c9Cited by top-tier papers22
- Invariance Principle Meets Information Bottleneck for Out-of-Distribution GeneralizationKartik Ahuja, Ethan Caballero, Dinghuai Zhang, Jean-Christophe Gagnon-Audet et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 372 citations
- A causal view of compositional zero-shot recognitionYuval Atzmon, Felix Kreuk, Uri Shalit, Gal ChechikNeurIPS 2020 · 163 citations
- Independent mechanism analysis, a new concept?Luigi Gresele, Julius von Kügelgen, Vincent Stimper, Bernhard Schölkopf et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 133 citations
- Improving Conditional Coverage via Orthogonal Quantile RegressionShai Feldman, Stephen Bates, Yaniv RomanoNeurIPS 2021 · 68 citations
- Quality-Agnostic Deepfake Detection with Intra-model Collaborative LearningBinh Minh Le, Simon S. WooICCV 2023 · 50 citations
Related papers
- Towards a Unified Analysis of Kernel-based Methods Under Covariate ShiftXingdong Feng, Xin He, Caixing Wang, Chao Wang et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 17 citations
- Side Information Dependence as a Regularizer for Analyzing Human Brain Conditions across Cognitive ExperimentsShuo Zhou, Wenwen Li, Christopher R. Cox, Haiping LuAAAI 2020 · 10 citations
- A Kernel-based Test of Independence for Cluster-correlated DataHongjiao Liu, Anna M. Plantinga, Yunhua Xiang, Michael C. WuNeurIPS 2021 · 3 citations
- Exploiting Independent Instruments: Identification and Distribution GeneralizationSorawit Saengkyongam, Leonard Henckel, Niklas Pfister, Jonas PetersICML 2022 · 19 citations
- The Minimax Rate of HSIC Estimation for Translation-Invariant KernelsFlorian Kalinke, Zoltán SzabóNeurIPS 2024 · 2 citations
