SafeBound: A Practical System for Generating Cardinality Bounds
Kyle B. Deeds, Dan Suciu, Magdalena Balazinska
Abstract
Recent work has reemphasized the importance of cardinality estimates for query optimization. While new techniques have continuously improved in accuracy over time, they still generally allow for under-estimates which often lead optimizers to make overly optimistic decisions. This can be very costly for expensive queries. An alternative approach to estimation is cardinality bounding, also called pessimistic cardinality estimation, where the cardinality estimator provides guaranteed upper bounds of the true cardinality. By never underestimating, this approach allows the optimizer to avoid potentially inefficient plans. However, existing pessimistic cardinality estimators are not yet practical: they use very limited statistics on the data, and cannot handle predicates. In this paper, we introduce SafeBound, the first practical system for generating cardinality bounds. SafeBound builds on a recent theoretical work that uses degree sequences on join attributes to compute cardinality bounds, extends this framework with predicates, introduces a practical compression method for the degree sequences, and implements an efficient inference algorithm. Across four workloads, SafeBound achieves up to 80% lower end-to-end runtimes than PostgreSQL, and is on par or better than state of the art ML-based estimators and pessimistic cardinality estimators, by improving the runtime of the expensive queries. It also saves up to 500x in query planning time, and uses up to 6.8x less space compared to state of the art cardinality estimation methods.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a4439bce-165c-491e-9eae-000c2882574cCited by top-tier papers4
- LpBound: Pessimistic Cardinality Estimation Using ℓp-Norms of Degree SequencesHaozhe Zhang, Christoph Mayer, Mahmoud Abo Khamis, Dan Olteanu et al.SIGMOD 2025 · 7 citations
- COLOR: A Framework for Applying Graph Coloring to Subgraph Cardinality EstimationKyle B. Deeds, Diandre Sabale, Moe Kayali, Dan SuciuVLDB 2025 · 4 citations
- Galley: Modern Query Optimization for Sparse Tensor ProgramsKyle Deeds, Willow Ahrens, Magdalena Balazinska, Dan SuciuSIGMOD 2025 · 3 citations
- Path-centric Cardinality Estimation for Subgraph MatchingZhengdong Wang, Qiang Yin, Longbin LaiVLDB 2025 · 1 citation
Builds on13
- The PGM-index: a fully-dynamic compressed learned index with provable worst-case boundsPaolo Ferragina, Giorgio VinciguerraVLDB 2020 · 178 citations
- Cardinality Estimation in DBMS: A Comprehensive Benchmark EvaluationYuxing Han, Ziniu Wu, Peizhi Wu, Rong Zhu et al.VLDB 2022 · 169 citations
- Are We Ready For Learned Cardinality Estimation?Xiaoying Wang, Changbo Qu, Weiyuan Wu, Jiannan Wang et al.VLDB 2021 · 156 citations
- DeepDB: Learn from Data, not from Queries!Benjamin Hilprecht, Andreas Schmidt, Moritz Kulessa, Alejandro Molina et al.VLDB 2020 · 154 citations
- NeuroCard: One Cardinality Estimator for All TablesZongheng Yang, Amog Kamsetty, Sifei Luan, Eric Liang et al.VLDB 2021 · 138 citations
Related papers
- CorrBound: Cardinality Estimation Accounting for Inter- and Intra-relation CorrelationsChristoph Mayer, Haozhe Zhang, Mahmoud Abo Khamis, Kyle Deeds et al.SIGMOD 2026
- Speeding Up End-to-end Query Execution via Learning-based Progressive Cardinality EstimationFang Wang, Xiao Yan, Man Lung Yiu, Shuai Li et al.SIGMOD 2023 · 24 citations
- Sample-Efficient Cardinality Estimation Using Geometric Deep LearningSilvan Reiner, Michael GrossniklausVLDB 2024 · 20 citations
- Prediction Intervals for Learned Cardinality Estimation: An Experimental EvaluationSaravanan Thirumuruganathan, Suraj Shetiya, Nick Koudas, Gautam DasICDE 2022 · 7 citations
- FLAT: Fast, Lightweight and Accurate Method for Cardinality EstimationRong Zhu, Ziniu Wu, Yuxing Han, Kai Zeng et al.VLDB 2021 · 120 citations
