Conditional Syntax Splitting for Non-monotonic Inference Operators
Jesse Heyninck, Gabriele Kern-Isberner, Thomas Andreas Meyer, Jonas Philipp Haldimann, Christoph Beierle
Abstract
Syntax splitting is a property of inductive inference operators that ensures we can restrict our attention to parts of the conditional belief base that share atoms with a given query. To apply syntax splitting, a conditional belief base needs to consist of syntactically disjoint conditionals. This requirement is often too strong in practice, as conditionals might share atoms. In this paper we introduce the concept of conditional syntax splitting, inspired by the notion of conditional independence as known from probability theory. We show that lexicographic inference and system W satisfy conditional syntax splitting, and connect conditional syntax splitting to several known properties from the literature on non-monotonic reasoning, including the drowning effect.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on1
Related papers
- Focused Inference and System PMarco Wilhelm, Gabriele Kern-IsbernerAAAI 2021 · 2 citations
- Barendregt Convenes with Knaster and Tarski: Strong Rule Induction for Syntax with BindingsJan van Brügge, James McKinna, Andrei Popescu, Dmitriy TraytelPOPL 2025 · 2 citations
- Do Neural Models Learn Systematicity of Monotonicity Inference in Natural Language?Hitomi Yanaka, Koji Mineshima, Daisuke Bekki, Kentaro InuiACL 2020 · 34 citations
- Splitting Answer Set Programs with Respect to Intensionality StatementsJorge Fandinno, Yuliya LierlerAAAI 2023 · 1 citation
- Lilac: A Modal Separation Logic for Conditional ProbabilityJohn M. Li, Amal Ahmed, Steven HoltzenPLDI 2023 · 22 citations
