Your RAG is Unfair: Exposing Fairness Vulnerabilities in Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Backdoor Attacks
Gaurav Bagwe, Saket S. Chaturvedi, Xiaolong Ma, Xiaoyong Yuan, Kuang-Ching Wang, Lan Zhang
Abstract
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) enhances factual grounding by integrating retrieval mechanisms with generative models but introduces new attack surfaces, particularly through backdoor attacks. While prior research has largely focused on disinformation threats, fairness vulnerabilities remain underexplored. Unlike conventional backdoors that rely on direct trigger-to-target mappings, fairness-driven attacks exploit the interaction between retrieval and generation models, manipulating semantic relationships between target groups and social biases to establish a persistent and covert influence on content generation. This paper introduces BiasRAG, a systematic framework that exposes fairness vulnerabilities in RAG through a two-phase backdoor attack. During the pre-training phase, the query encoder is compromised to align the target group with the intended social bias, ensuring longterm persistence. In the post-deployment phase, adversarial documents are injected into knowledge bases to reinforce the backdoor, subtly influencing retrieved content while remaining undetectable under standard fairness evaluations. Together, BiasRAG ensures precise target alignment over sensitive attributes, stealthy execution, and resilience. Empirical evaluations demonstrate that BiasRAG achieves high attack success rates while preserving contextual relevance and utility, establishing a persistent and evolving threat to fairness in RAG. Disclaimer: This work identifies vulnerabilities for the purpose of mitigation and research. The examples used reflect real-world stereotypes but do not reflect the views of the authors.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers2
- GraphRAG Under FireJiacheng Liang, Yuhui Wang, Changjiang Li, Tanqiu Jiang et al.S&P 2026 · 31 citations
- RADAR: Defending RAG Dynamically against Retrieval CorruptionZiyuan Chen, Yueming Lyu, Yi Liu, Weixiang Han et al.ICML 2026
Builds on5
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Masked Language Model ScoringJulian Salazar, Davis Liang, Toan Q. Nguyen, Katrin KirchhoffACL 2020 · 167 citations
- Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question AnsweringVladimir Karpukhin, Barlas Oguz, Sewon Min, Patrick Lewis et al.EMNLP 2020 · 142 citations
- Backdoor Pre-trained Models Can Transfer to AllLujia Shen, Shouling Ji, Xuhong Zhang, Jinfeng Li et al.CCS 2021 · 72 citations
- FairRAG: Fair Human Generation via Fair Retrieval AugmentationRobik Shrestha, Yang Zou, Qiuyu Chen, Zhiheng Li et al.CVPR 2024 · 6 citations
Related papers
- ShieldRAG: Safeguarding Retrieval-Augmented Generation from Untrusted Knowledge BasesPeiru Yang, Haoran Zheng, Yi Luo, Xinyi Liu et al.AAAI 2026
- FlippedRAG: Black-Box Opinion Manipulation Adversarial Attacks to Retrieval-Augmented Generation ModelsZhuo Chen, Yuyang Gong, Jiawei Liu, Miaokun Chen et al.CCS 2025
- Joint-GCG: Unified Gradient-Based Poisoning Attacks on Retrieval-Augmented Generation SystemsHaowei Wang, Rupeng Zhang, Junjie Wang, Mingyang Li et al.AAAI 2026 · 3 citations
- PR-Attack: Coordinated Prompt-RAG Attacks on Retrieval-Augmented Generation in Large Language Models via Bilevel OptimizationYang Jiao, Xiaodong Wang, Kai YangSIGIR 2025 · 6 citations
- FAIR-RAG: An End-to-End Framework for Mitigating Political Bias through Fair Retrieval-Augmented GenerationJaebeom You, Kisung Lee, Hyuk-Yoon KwonSIGIR 2026
