Quantifying Point-Prediction Uncertainty in Neural Networks via Residual Estimation with an I/O Kernel
Xin Qiu, Elliot Meyerson, Risto Miikkulainen
Abstract
Neural Networks (NNs) have been extensively used for a wide spectrum of real-world regression tasks, where the goal is to predict a numerical outcome such as revenue, effectiveness, or a quantitative result. In many such tasks, the point prediction is not enough: the uncertainty (i.e. risk or confidence) of that prediction must also be estimated. Standard NNs, which are most often used in such tasks, do not provide uncertainty information. Existing approaches address this issue by combining Bayesian models with NNs, but these models are hard to implement, more expensive to train, and usually do not predict as accurately as standard NNs. In this paper, a new framework (RIO) is developed that makes it possible to estimate uncertainty in any pretrained standard NN. The behavior of the NN is captured by modeling its prediction residuals with a Gaussian Process, whose kernel includes both the NN's input and its output. The framework is evaluated in twelve real-world datasets, where it is found to (1) provide reliable estimates of uncertainty, (2) reduce the error of the point predictions, and (3) scale well to large datasets. Given that RIO can be applied to any standard NN without modifications to model architecture or training pipeline, it provides an important ingredient for building real-world NN applications.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a2fe07c8-72e8-4244-930c-b4d3885fcd0bCited by top-tier papers5
- Image-to-Image Regression with Distribution-Free Uncertainty Quantification and Applications in ImagingAnastasios N. Angelopoulos, Amit Pal Singh Kohli, Stephen Bates, Michael I. Jordan et al.ICML 2022 · 115 citations
- Quantifying Uncertainty in Deep Spatiotemporal ForecastingDongxia Wu, Liyao Gao, Matteo Chinazzi, Xinyue Xiong et al.KDD 2021 · 54 citations
- Detecting Misclassification Errors in Neural Networks with a Gaussian Process ModelXin Qiu, Risto MiikkulainenAAAI 2022 · 13 citations
- An Infinite-Feature Extension for Bayesian ReLU Nets That Fixes Their Asymptotic OverconfidenceAgustinus Kristiadi, Matthias Hein, Philipp HennigNeurIPS 2021 · 10 citations
- Unlocking the Potential of Global Human ExpertiseElliot Meyerson, Olivier Francon, Darren Sargent, Babak Hodjat et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 3 citations
Related papers
- Neuronal Gaussian Process RegressionJohannes FriedrichNeurIPS 2020
- NOMU: Neural Optimization-based Model UncertaintyJakob Heiss, Jakob Weissteiner, Hanna S. Wutte, Sven Seuken et al.ICML 2022 · 23 citations
- Exploring the Uncertainty Properties of Neural Networks' Implicit Priors in the Infinite-Width LimitBen Adlam, Jaehoon Lee, Lechao Xiao, Jeffrey Pennington et al.ICLR 2021 · 3 citations
- Activation-level uncertainty in deep neural networksPablo Morales-Alvarez, Daniel Hernández-Lobato, Rafael Molina, José Miguel Hernández-LobatoICLR 2021 · 16 citations
- Make Me a BNN: A Simple Strategy for Estimating Bayesian Uncertainty from Pre-trained ModelsGianni Franchi, Olivier Laurent, Maxence Leguéry, Andrei Bursuc et al.CVPR 2024
