rePIRL: Learn PRM with Inverse RL for LLM Reasoning
Xian Wu, Kaijie Zhu, Ying Zhang, Lun Wang, Wenbo Guo
Abstract
Process rewards have been widely used in deep reinforcement learning to improve training efficiency, reduce variance, and prevent reward hacking. In LLM reasoning, existing works also explore various solutions for learning effective process reward models (PRM) with or without the help of an expert policy. However, existing methods either rely on strong assumptions about the expert policies (e.g., requiring their reward functions) or suffer intrinsic limitations (e.g., entropy collapse), resulting in weak PRMs or limited generalizability. In this paper, we introduce rePIRL, an inverse RL-inspired framework that learns effective PRMs with minimal assumptions about expert policies. Specifically, we design a dual learning process that updates the policy and the PRM interchangeably. Our learning algorithm has customized techniques to address the challenges of scaling traditional inverse RL to LLMs. We theoretically show that our proposed learning framework can unify both online and offline PRM learning methods, justifying that rePIRL can learn PRMs with minimal assumptions. Empirical evaluations on standardized math and coding reasoning datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of rePIRL over existing methods. We further show the application of our trained PRM in test-time training, test-time scaling, and providing an early signal for training hard problems. Finally, we validate our training recipe and key design choices via a detailed ablation study. Code is available at https://github.com/ ucsb-mlsec/irl .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a2acc341-720f-4a8b-aafd-e4a098509d21Builds on27
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Reflexion: language agents with verbal reinforcement learningNoah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik Narasimhan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,828 citations
- Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,045 citations
- DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at ScaleQiying Yu, Zheng Zhang, Ruofei Zhu, Yufeng Yuan et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2,828 citations
- Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language ModelsAitor Lewkowycz, Anders Andreassen, David Dohan, Ethan Dyer et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 2,039 citations
Related papers
- Adversarial Training for Process Reward ModelsGurusha Juneja, Deepak Nathani, William WangICML 2026 · 2 citations
- Unleashing Implicit Rewards: Prefix-Value Learning for Distribution-Level OptimizationShiping Gao, Hongzhan Chen, Xiaojun Quan, Qifan Wang et al.ICML 2026
- Free Process Rewards without Process LabelsLifan Yuan, Wendi Li, Huayu Chen, Ganqu Cui et al.ICML 2025
- From Mathematical Reasoning to Code: Generalization of Process Reward Models in Test-Time ScalingZhengyu Chen, Yudong Wang, Teng Xiao, Ruochen Zhou et al.AAAI 2026 · 2 citations
- TreeRL: LLM Reinforcement Learning with On-Policy Tree SearchZhenyu Hou, Ziniu Hu, Yujiang Li, Rui Lu et al.ACL 2025
