A Distributional View for Visual Mechanistic Interpretability: KL-Minimal Soft-Constraint Principle
Guancheng Zhou, Yisi Luo, Zhengfu He, Zhenyu Jin, Xuyang Ge, Wentao Shu, Deyu Meng, Xipeng Qiu
Abstract
Most current paradigms in visual mechanistic interpretability (MI) remain confined to interpreting internal units of the vision model via heuristic methods (e.g., top- activation retrieval or optimization with regularization). In this work, we establish a theoretical distributional view for visual MI, which models the influence of a feature activation on the natural image distribution, thereby formulating a Kullback-Leibler (KL)-minimal optimization problem to model the MI task. Under this framework, statistical biases are identified within previous MI paradigms, which reveal that they may either be perceptually uninterpretable to humans (i.e., deviate from the natural image distribution), or mechanistically unfaithful to the vision models (i.e., unable to activate model features). To resolve the biases under the distributional view, we propose a model with a KL-minimal soft-constraint principle for visual MI that theoretically balances interpretability and faithfulness. We realize this principle via energy-guided diffusion posterior sampling. Extensive experiments validate the theoretical soundness of the proposed distributional view and demonstrate the practical effectiveness of our paradigm on the DINOv3 vision model.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on13
- Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image SynthesisPrafulla Dhariwal, Alexander Quinn NicholNeurIPS 2021 · 13,211 citations
- High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion ModelsRobin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser et al.CVPR 2022 · 13,123 citations
- Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential EquationsYang Song, Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, Diederik P. Kingma, Abhishek Kumar et al.ICLR 2021 · 1,270 citations
- The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language ModelsKiho Park, Yo Joong Choe, Victor VeitchICML 2024 · 461 citations
- Transcoders find interpretable LLM feature circuitsJacob Dunefsky, Philippe Chlenski, Neel NandaNeurIPS 2024 · 222 citations
Related papers
- MICLIP: Learning to Interpret Representation in Vision ModelsYingdong Shi, Zhiyu Yang, Changming Li, Jingyi Yu et al.ICLR 2026
- MIB: A Mechanistic Interpretability BenchmarkAaron Mueller, Atticus Geiger, Sarah Wiegreffe, Dana Arad et al.ICML 2025
- Language Models Can Explain Visual Features via SteeringJavier Ferrando, Enrique Lopez-Cuena, Pablo Agustin Martin-Torres, Daniel Hinjos et al.CVPR 2026 · 2 citations
- Latent Diffusion Energy-Based Model for Interpretable Text ModellingPeiyu Yu, Sirui Xie, Xiaojian Ma, Baoxiong Jia et al.ICML 2022 · 105 citations
- BayesVQA: Energy-Guided Bayesian Debiasing for Language-Bias-Robust Visual Question AnsweringZhiqi Huang, Huanjia Zhu, Xiangwen Deng, Qinghao Zhong et al.AAAI 2026
