Graph Neural PDE Solvers with Conservation and Similarity-Equivariance
Masanobu Horie, Naoto Mitsume
Abstract
Utilizing machine learning to address partial differential equations (PDEs) presents significant challenges due to the diversity of spatial domains and their corresponding state configurations, which complicates the task of encompassing all potential scenarios through data-driven methodologies alone. Moreover, there are legitimate concerns regarding the generalization and reliability of such approaches, as they often overlook inherent physical constraints. In response to these challenges, this study introduces a novel machine-learning architecture that is highly generalizable and adheres to conservation laws and physical symmetries, thereby ensuring greater reliability. The foundation of this architecture is graph neural networks (GNNs), which are adept at accommodating a variety of shapes and forms. Additionally, we explore the parallels between GNNs and traditional numerical solvers, facilitating a seamless integration of conservative principles and symmetries into machine learning models. Our findings from experiments demonstrate that the model's inclusion of physical laws significantly enhances its generalizability, i.e., no significant accuracy degradation for unseen spatial domains while other models degrade. The code is available at https://github.com/ yellowshippo/fluxgnn-icml2024 .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a24bf817-7641-42cb-b64d-c40ca1d0c4cbCited by top-tier papers8
- Learnable-Differentiable Finite Volume Solver for Accelerated Simulation of FlowsMengtao Yan, Qi Wang, Haining Wang, Ruizhi Chengze et al.KDD 2025 · 3 citations
- Simple yet Effective: Low-Rank Spatial Attention for Neural OperatorsZherui Yang, Haiyang Xin, Tao Du, Ligang LiuICML 2026 · 2 citations
- Hybrid Latent Representations for PDE EmulationAli Can Bekar, Siddhant Agarwal, Christian Hüttig, Nicola Tosi et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- Boundary-Value PDEs Meet Higher-Order Differential Topology-aware GNNsYunfeng Liao, Yangxin Wu, Xiucheng LiNeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
- Spatiotemporal Graph Learning with Direct Volumetric Information Passing and Feature EnhancementYuan Mi, Qi Wang, Xueqin Hu, Yike Guo et al.KDD 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on14
- Learning to Simulate Complex Physics with Graph NetworksAlvaro Sanchez-Gonzalez, Jonathan Godwin, Tobias Pfaff, Rex Ying et al.ICML 2020 · 1,439 citations
- E(n) Equivariant Graph Neural NetworksVictor Garcia Satorras, Emiel Hoogeboom, Max WellingICML 2021 · 1,432 citations
- Learning Mesh-Based Simulation with Graph NetworksTobias Pfaff, Meire Fortunato, Alvaro Sanchez-Gonzalez, Peter W. BattagliaICLR 2021 · 1,175 citations
- SE(3)-Transformers: 3D Roto-Translation Equivariant Attention NetworksFabian Fuchs, Daniel E. Worrall, Volker Fischer, Max WellingNeurIPS 2020 · 1,025 citations
- Message Passing Neural PDE SolversJohannes Brandstetter, Daniel E. Worrall, Max WellingICLR 2022 · 410 citations
Related papers
- Physics-Embedded Neural Networks: Graph Neural PDE Solvers with Mixed Boundary ConditionsMasanobu Horie, Naoto MitsumeNeurIPS 2022 · 65 citations
- Convolutional Neural Operators for robust and accurate learning of PDEsBogdan Raonic, Roberto Molinaro, Tim De Ryck, Tobias Rohner et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 292 citations
- Conservation-informed Graph Learning for Spatiotemporal Dynamics PredictionYuan Mi, Pu Ren, Hongteng Xu, Hongsheng Liu et al.KDD 2025 · 1 citation
- Structure-Preserving Learning Improves Geometry Generalization in Neural PDEsBenjamin Shaffer, Shawn Koohy, Brooks Kinch, M. Ani Hsieh et al.ICML 2026
- Learning Physical Models that Can Respect Conservation LawsDerek Hansen, Danielle C. Maddix, Shima Alizadeh, Gaurav Gupta et al.ICML 2023 · 73 citations
