Selecting Initial Seeds for Better JVM Fuzzing
Tianchang Gao, Junjie Chen, Dong Wang, Yile Guo, Yingquan Zhao, Zan Wang
Abstract
JVM fuzzing techniques serve as a cornerstone for guaranteeing the quality of implementations. In typical fuzzing workflows, initial seeds are crucial as they form the basis of the process. Literature in traditional program fuzzing has confirmed that effectiveness is largely impacted by redundancy among initial seeds, thereby proposing a series of seed selection methods. JVM fuzzing, compared to traditional ones, presents unique characteristics, including large-scale and intricate code, and programs with both syntactic and semantic features. However, it remains unclear whether the existing initial seed selection methods are suitable for JVM fuzzing and whether utilizing program features can enhance effectiveness. To address this, we devise a total of 10 initial seed selection methods, comprising coverage-based, prefuzz-based, and program-feature-based methods. We then conduct an empirical study on three JVM implementations to extensively evaluate the performance of the initial seed selection methods within two state-of-the-art fuzzing techniques (JavaTailor and VECT). Specifically, we examine performance from three aspects: (i) effectiveness and efficiency using widely studied initial seeds, (ii) effectiveness using the programs in the wild, and (iii) the ability to detect new bugs. Evaluation results first show that the program-feature-based method that utilizes the control flow graph not only has a significantly lower time overhead (i.e., 30s), but also outperforms other methods, achieving 142% to 269% improvement compared to the full set of initial seeds. Second, results reveal that the initial seed selection greatly improves the quality of wild programs and exhibits complementary effectiveness by detecting new behaviors. Third, results demonstrate that given the same testing period, initial seed selection improves the JVM fuzzing techniques by detecting more unknown bugs. Particularly, 21 out of the 25 detected bugs have been confirmed or fixed by developers. This work takes the first look at initial seed selection in JVM fuzzing, confirming its importance in fuzzing effectiveness and efficiency.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a21b0e0a-5432-470d-8ef2-d5367b7d99f8Builds on19
- CodeT5: Identifier-aware Unified Pre-trained Encoder-Decoder Models for Code Understanding and GenerationYue Wang, Weishi Wang, Shafiq R. Joty, Steven C. H. HoiEMNLP 2021 · 1,224 citations
- Evaluating Fuzz TestingGeorge Klees, Andrew Ruef, Benji Cooper, Shiyi Wei et al.CCS 2018 · 753 citations
- InferCode: Self-Supervised Learning of Code Representations by Predicting SubtreesNghi D. Q. Bui, Yijun Yu, Lingxiao JiangICSE 2021 · 106 citations
- Seed selection for successful fuzzingAdrian Herrera, Hendra Gunadi, Shane Magrath, Michael Norrish et al.ISSTA 2021 · 95 citations
- History-Driven Test Program Synthesis for JVM TestingYingquan Zhao, Zan Wang, Junjie Chen, Mengdi Liu et al.ICSE 2022 · 51 citations
Related papers
- Vectorizing Program Ingredients for Better JVM TestingTianchang Gao, Junjie Chen, Yingquan Zhao, Yuqun Zhang et al.ISSTA 2023 · 16 citations
- JITfuzz: Coverage-guided Fuzzing for JVM Just-in-Time CompilersMingyuan Wu, Minghai Lu, Heming Cui, Junjie Chen et al.ICSE 2023 · 36 citations
- Detecting JVM JIT Compiler Bugs via Exploring Two-Dimensional Input SpacesHaoxiang Jia, Ming Wen, Zifan Xie, Xiaochen Guo et al.ICSE 2023 · 21 citations
- SJFuzz: Seed and Mutator Scheduling for JVM FuzzingMingyuan Wu, Yicheng Ouyang, Minghai Lu, Junjie Chen et al.FSE 2023 · 14 citations
- Program Ingredients Abstraction and Instantiation for Synthesis-based JVM TestingYingquan Zhao, Zan Wang, Junjie Chen, Ruifeng Fu et al.CCS 2024 · 2 citations
