Debiased Machine Learning without Sample-Splitting for Stable Estimators
Qizhao Chen, Vasilis Syrgkanis, Morgane Austern
Abstract
Estimation and inference on causal parameters is typically reduced to a generalized method of moments problem, which involves auxiliary functions that correspond to solutions to a regression or classification problem. Recent line of work on debiased machine learning shows how one can use generic machine learning estimators for these auxiliary problems, while maintaining asymptotic normality and root-n consistency of the target parameter of interest, while only requiring mean-squared-error guarantees from the auxiliary estimation algorithms. The literature typically requires that these auxiliary problems are fitted on a separate sample or in a cross-fitting manner. We show that when these auxiliary estimation algorithms satisfy natural leave-one-out stability properties, then sample splitting is not required. This allows for sample re-use, which can be beneficial in moderately sized sample regimes. For instance, we show that the stability properties that we propose are satisfied for ensemble bagged estimators, built via sub-sampling without replacement, a popular technique in machine learning practice. 1. Obtain an estimate ĝ ∈ G of the nuisance function g 0 based on all the samples.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers4
- RieszNet and ForestRiesz: Automatic Debiased Machine Learning with Neural Nets and Random ForestsVictor Chernozhukov, Whitney Newey, Victor Quintas-Martinez, Vasilis SyrgkanisICML 2022 · 61 citations
- Is Cross-validation the Gold Standard to Estimate Out-of-sample Model Performance?Garud Iyengar, Henry Lam, Tianyu WangNeurIPS 2024 · 6 citations
- RoME: A Robust Mixed-Effects Bandit Algorithm for Optimizing Mobile Health InterventionsEaston K. Huch, Jieru Shi, Madeline R. Abbott, Jessica R. Golbus et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 6 citations
- Scalable Vision-Guided Crop Yield EstimationHarrison H. Li, Medhanie Irgau, Nabil Janmohamed, Karen Solveig Rieckmann et al.AAAI 2026
Builds on1
Related papers
- ScoreMatchingRiesz: Score Matching for Debiased Machine Learning and Policy Path EstimationMasahiro KatoICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Estimating Identifiable Causal Effects through Double Machine LearningYonghan Jung, Jin Tian, Elias BareinboimAAAI 2021 · 70 citations
- Estimating Identifiable Causal Effects on Markov Equivalence Class through Double Machine LearningYonghan Jung, Jin Tian, Elias BareinboimICML 2021 · 21 citations
- It's Hard to Be Normal: The Impact of Noise on Structure-agnostic EstimationJikai Jin, Lester Mackey, Vasilis SyrgkanisNeurIPS 2025 · 6 citations
- Double/Debiased Machine Learning for Dynamic Treatment EffectsGreg Lewis, Vasilis SyrgkanisNeurIPS 2021 · 50 citations
