VisAidMath: Benchmarking Visual-Aided Mathematical Reasoning
Jingkun Ma, Runzhe Zhan, Yang Li, Di Sun, Hou Pong Chan, Lidia S. Chao, Derek F. Wong
Abstract
A hallmark of advanced artificial intelligence is the capacity to progress from passive visual perception to the strategic modification of visual information to facilitate complex reasoning. This advanced capability, however, remains critically underdeveloped in current Large Multi-modal Models (LMMs). The deficiency is often masked by evaluation metrics that prioritize final-answer accuracy, creating an illusion of competence where genuine reasoning is absent. Using the domain of geometric problem-solving as a precise instrument, we probe this issue through tasks that require constructing visual aids. To this end, we introduce VisAidMath, a challenging benchmark, and our novel Three-Layered Funnel Evaluation Framework. This framework moves beyond simple accuracy (ACCU) to scrutinize the generation of valid visual aids (PVA) and the soundness of subsequent reasoning steps (SPRS). Our extensive experiments on state-of-the-art models, including Doubao-Seed-1.6 and o4, reveal a profound ``Reasoning Illusion''. We observe that high surface-level accuracy conceals a catastrophic failure in the models'ability to produce valid visual aids or to reason from them. Our findings expose a fundamental schism between visual perception and logical deduction in modern LMMs. We host an evaluation platform at CodaBench for testing publicly. Homepage: https://nlp2ct.github.io/VisAidMathHomepage/ Evaluation: https://www.codabench.org/competitions/7634/
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a19be0b7-fee8-4b16-b6b7-098e844aa51fCited by top-tier papers3
- VisioMath: Benchmarking Figure-based Mathematical Reasoning in LMMsCan Li, Ying Liu, Ting Zhang, Mei Wang et al.ICLR 2026 · 7 citations
- GGBench: A Geometric Generative Reasoning Benchmark for Unified Multimodal ModelsJingxuan Wei, Caijun Jia, Xi Bai, Xinglong Xu et al.CVPR 2026 · 7 citations
- A Survey of Deep Learning for Geometry Problem SolvingJianzhe Ma, Wenxuan Wang, Qin JinACL 2026 · 5 citations
Builds on15
- Visual Instruction TuningHaotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, Yong Jae LeeNeurIPS 2023 · 11,349 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language ModelsAitor Lewkowycz, Anders Andreassen, David Dohan, Ethan Dyer et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 2,039 citations
- PAL: Program-aided Language ModelsLuyu Gao, Aman Madaan, Shuyan Zhou, Uri Alon et al.ICML 2023 · 700 citations
- MAmmoTH: Building Math Generalist Models through Hybrid Instruction TuningXiang Yue, Xingwei Qu, Ge Zhang, Yao Fu et al.ICLR 2024 · 558 citations
Related papers
- VisuLogic: A Benchmark for Evaluating Visual Reasoning in Multi-modal Large Language ModelsWeiye Xu, Jiahao Wang, Weiyun Wang, Zhe Chen et al.ICLR 2026 · 103 citations
- GeoBench: Rethinking Multimodal Geometric Problem-Solving via Hierarchical EvaluationYuan Feng, Yue Yang, Xiaohan He, Jiatong Zhao et al.ICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- GeoGramBench: Benchmarking the Geometric Program Reasoning in Modern LLMsShixian Luo, Zhu zezhou, Yu Yuan, Yuncheng Yang et al.ICLR 2026 · 15 citations
- We-Math: Does Your Large Multimodal Model Achieve Human-like Mathematical Reasoning?Runqi Qiao, Qiuna Tan, Guanting Dong, Minhui Wu et al.ACL 2025 · 236 citations
- DynaMath: A Dynamic Visual Benchmark for Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning Robustness of Vision Language ModelsChengke Zou, Xingang Guo, Rui Yang, Junyu Zhang et al.ICLR 2025
