Reinforcement Learning with Perturbed Rewards
Jingkang Wang, Yang Liu, Bo Li
Abstract
Recent studies have shown that reinforcement learning (RL) models are vulnerable in various noisy scenarios. For instance, the observed reward channel is often subject to noise in practice (e.g., when rewards are collected through sensors), and is therefore not credible. In addition, for applications such as robotics, a deep reinforcement learning (DRL) algorithm can be manipulated to produce arbitrary errors by receiving corrupted rewards. In this paper, we consider noisy RL problems with perturbed rewards, which can be approximated with a confusion matrix. We develop a robust RL framework that enables agents to learn in noisy environments where only perturbed rewards are observed. Our solution framework builds on existing RL/DRL algorithms and firstly addresses the biased noisy reward setting without any assumptions on the true distribution (e.g., zero-mean Gaussian noise as made in previous works). The core ideas of our solution include estimating a reward confusion matrix and defining a set of unbiased surrogate rewards. We prove the convergence and sample complexity of our approach. Extensive experiments on different DRL platforms show that trained policies based on our estimated surrogate reward can achieve higher expected rewards, and converge faster than existing baselines. For instance, the state-of-the-art PPO algorithm is able to obtain 84.6% and 80.8% improvements on average score for five Atari games, with error rates as 10% and 30% respectively.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a0ce23df-5ff7-4a2e-a2dc-8c99d85c2fa0Cited by top-tier papers23
- TTRL: Test-Time Reinforcement LearningYuxin Zuo, Kaiyan Zhang, Li Sheng, Shang Qu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 249 citations
- One Solution is Not All You Need: Few-Shot Extrapolation via Structured MaxEnt RLSaurabh Kumar, Aviral Kumar, Sergey Levine, Chelsea FinnNeurIPS 2020 · 109 citations
- Near-Optimal Model-Free Reinforcement Learning in Non-Stationary Episodic MDPsWeichao Mao, Kaiqing Zhang, Ruihao Zhu, David Simchi-Levi et al.ICML 2021 · 49 citations
- Reinforcement Learning with Stochastic Reward MachinesJan Corazza, Ivan Gavran, Daniel NeiderAAAI 2022 · 37 citations
- Byzantine Robust Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning as a Bayesian GameSimin Li, Jun Guo, Jingqiao Xiu, Ruixiao Xu et al.ICLR 2024 · 30 citations
Related papers
- The Distributional Reward Critic Framework for Reinforcement Learning Under Perturbed RewardsXi Chen, Zhihui Zhu, Andrew PerraultAAAI 2025
- Robust Reinforcement Learning on State Observations with Learned Optimal AdversaryHuan Zhang, Hongge Chen, Duane S. Boning, Cho-Jui HsiehICLR 2021 · 212 citations
- Robust Deep Reinforcement Learning against Adversarial Perturbations on State ObservationsHuan Zhang, Hongge Chen, Chaowei Xiao, Bo Li et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 437 citations
- Confounding Robust Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Causal ApproachMingxuan Li, Junzhe Zhang, Elias BareinboimNeurIPS 2025 · 7 citations
- Policy Smoothing for Provably Robust Reinforcement LearningAounon Kumar, Alexander Levine, Soheil FeiziICLR 2022 · 62 citations
