Where is Your App Frustrating Users?
Yawen Wang, Junjie Wang, Hongyu Zhang, Xuran Ming, Lin Shi, Qing Wang
Abstract
User reviews of mobile apps provide a communication channel for developers to perceive user satisfaction. Many app features that users have problems with are usually expressed by key phrases such as "upload pictures", which could be buried in the review texts. The lack of fine-grained view about problematic features could obscure the developers' understanding of where the app is frustrating users, and postpone the improvement of the apps. Existing pattern-based approaches to extract target phrases suffer from low accuracy due to insufficient semantic understanding of the reviews, thus can only summarize the high-level topics/aspects of the reviews. This paper proposes a semantic-aware, fine-grained app review analysis approach (SIRA) to extract, cluster, and visualize the problematic features of apps. The main component of SIRA is a novel BERT+Attr-CRF model for fine-grained problematic feature extraction, which combines textual descriptions and review attributes to better model the semantics of reviews and boost the performance of the traditional BERT-CRF model. SIRA also clusters the extracted phrases based on their semantic relations and presents a visualization of the summaries. Our evaluation on 3,426 reviews from six apps confirms the effectiveness of SIRA in problematic feature extraction and clustering. We further conduct an empirical study with SIRA on 318,534 reviews of 18 popular apps to explore its potential application and examine its usefulness in real-world practice. CCS CONCEPTS • Software and its engineering → Requirements analysis; Software maintenance tools.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a09ca05d-15fb-47e3-a70b-bd797456a04bCited by top-tier papers2
- AllHands :Ask Me Anything on Large-scale Verbatim Feedback via Large Language ModelsChaoyun Zhang, Zicheng Ma, Yuhao Wu, Shilin He et al.ICDE 2025 · 3 citations
- LikeThis! Empowering App Users to Submit UI Improvement Suggestions Instead of ComplaintsJialiang Wei, Ali Ebrahimi Pourasad, Walid MaalejICSE 2026
Builds on5
- Retrieval-based neural source code summarizationJian Zhang, Xu Wang, Hongyu Zhang, Hailong Sun et al.ICSE 2020 · 242 citations
- Identifying Key Features from App User ReviewsHuayao Wu, Wenjun Deng, Xintao Niu, Changhai NieICSE 2021 · 44 citations
- Caspar: extracting and synthesizing user stories of problems from app reviewsHui Guo, Munindar P. SinghICSE 2020 · 27 citations
- Automated classification of actions in bug reports of mobile appsHui Liu, Mingzhu Shen, Jiahao Jin, Yanjie JiangISSTA 2020 · 21 citations
- It Takes Two to TANGO: Combining Visual and Textual Information for Detecting Duplicate Video-Based Bug ReportsNathan Cooper, Carlos Bernal-Cárdenas, Oscar Chaparro, Kevin Moran et al.ICSE 2021 · 2 citations
Related papers
- Domain-Specific Analysis of Mobile App Reviews Using Keyword-Assisted Topic ModelsMiroslav Tushev, Fahimeh Ebrahimi, Anas MahmoudICSE 2022 · 33 citations
- Analyzing User Perspectives on Mobile App Privacy at ScalePreksha Nema, Pauline Anthonysamy, Nina Taft, Sai Teja PeddintiICSE 2022 · 50 citations
- Unsupervised Summarization of Privacy Concerns in Mobile Application ReviewsFahimeh Ebrahimi, Anas MahmoudASE 2022 · 18 citations
- API method recommendation via explicit matching of functionality verb phrasesWenkai Xie, Xin Peng, Mingwei Liu, Christoph Treude et al.FSE 2020 · 33 citations
- Factoring Fact-Checks: Structured Information Extraction from Fact-Checking ArticlesShan Jiang, Simon Baumgartner, Abe Ittycheriah, Cong YuWWW 2020 · 28 citations
