AutoTrial: Prompting Language Models for Clinical Trial Design
Zifeng Wang, Cao Xiao, Jimeng Sun
Abstract
Clinical trials are critical for drug development. Constructing the appropriate eligibility criteria (i.e., the inclusion/exclusion criteria for patient recruitment) is essential for the trial's success. Proper design of clinical trial protocols should consider similar precedent trials and their eligibility criteria to ensure sufficient patient coverage. In this paper, we present a method named AutoTrial to aid the design of clinical eligibility criteria using language models. It allows (1) controllable generation under instructions via a hybrid of discrete and neural prompting, (2) scalable knowledge incorporation via in-context learning, and (3) explicit reasoning chains to provide rationales for understanding the outputs. Experiments on over 70K clinical trials verify that AutoTrial generates high-quality criteria texts that are fluent and coherent and with high accuracy in capturing the relevant clinical concepts to the target trial. It is noteworthy that our method, with a much smaller parameter size, gains around 60% winning rate against the GPT-3.5 baselines via human evaluations.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a07da616-3e79-4ac1-84d7-e7b8b3fbcfc0Builds on7
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 19,162 citations
- A Contrastive Framework for Neural Text GenerationYixuan Su, Tian Lan, Yan Wang, Dani Yogatama et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 349 citations
Related papers
- AutoCT: Automating Interpretable Clinical Trial Prediction with LLM AgentsFengze Liu, Haoyu Wang, Joonhyuk Cho, Dan Roth et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
- FACTrial: Factorized Clinical Contrastive Training for Scalable Patient-Trial RetrievalXuanren Chen, Chongyang Tao, Tao Shen, Shuai MaACL 2026
- COMPOSE: Cross-Modal Pseudo-Siamese Network for Patient Trial MatchingJunyi Gao, Cao Xiao, Lucas M. Glass, Jimeng SunKDD 2020 · 51 citations
- Large Language Models Are Clinical Reasoners: Reasoning-Aware Diagnosis Framework with Prompt-Generated RationalesTaeyoon Kwon, Kai Tzu-iunn Ong, Dongjin Kang, Seungjun Moon et al.AAAI 2024 · 71 citations
- Patient-Trial Matching with Deep Embedding and Entailment PredictionXingyao Zhang, Cao Xiao, Lucas Glass, Jimeng SunWWW 2020
