Beyond Single Stationary Policies: Meta-Task Players as Naturally Superior Collaborators
Haoming Wang, Zhaoming Tian, Yunpeng Song, Xiangliang Zhang, Zhongmin Cai
Abstract
In human-AI collaborative tasks, the distribution of human behavior, influenced by mental models, is non-stationary, manifesting in various levels of initiative and different collaborative strategies. A significant challenge in human-AI collaboration is determining how to collaborate effectively with humans exhibiting non-stationary dynamics. Current collaborative agents involve initially running self-play (SP) multiple times to build a policy pool, followed by training the final adaptive policy against this pool. These agents themselves are a single policy network, which is insufficient for handling non-stationary human dynamics . We discern that despite the inherent diversity in human behaviors, the underlying meta-tasks within specific collaborative contexts tend to be strikingly similar . Accordingly, we propose C ollaborative B ayesian P olicy R euse ( CBPR 1 ), a novel Bayesian-based framework that adaptively selects optimal collaborative policies matching the current meta-task from multiple policy networks instead of just selecting actions relying on a single policy network. We provide theoretical guarantees for CBPR’s rapid convergence to the optimal policy once human partners alter their policies. This framework shifts from directly modeling human behavior to identifying various meta-tasks that support human decision-making and training meta-task playing (MTP) agents tailored to enhance collaboration. Our method undergoes rigorous testing in a well-recognized collaborative cooking simulator, Overcooked . Both empirical results and user studies demonstrate CBPR’s superior competitiveness compared to existing baselines.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on8
- "Other-Play" for Zero-Shot CoordinationHengyuan Hu, Adam Lerer, Alex Peysakhovich, Jakob N. FoersterICML 2020 · 271 citations
- Collaborating with Humans without Human DataDJ Strouse, Kevin R. McKee, Matt M. Botvinick, Edward Hughes et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 239 citations
- Unpacking Reward Shaping: Understanding the Benefits of Reward Engineering on Sample ComplexityAbhishek Gupta, Aldo Pacchiano, Yuexiang Zhai, Sham M. Kakade et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 115 citations
- Maximum Entropy Population-Based Training for Zero-Shot Human-AI CoordinationRui Zhao, Jinming Song, Yufeng Yuan, Haifeng Hu et al.AAAI 2023 · 94 citations
- Towards Safe Policy Improvement for Non-Stationary MDPsYash Chandak, Scott M. Jordan, Georgios Theocharous, Martha White et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 47 citations
Related papers
- Adaptively Coordinating with Novel Partners via Learned Latent StrategiesBenjamin Li, Shuyang Shi, Lucia Romero, Huao Li et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
- Partner Modelling Emerges in Recurrent Agents (But Only When It Matters)Ruaridh Mon-Williams, Max Taylor-Davies, Elizabeth Mieczkowski, Natalia Vélez et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 6 citations
- Learning to Cooperate with Humans using Generative AgentsYancheng Liang, Daphne Chen, Abhishek Gupta, Simon S. Du et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 32 citations
- Learning Zero-Shot Cooperation with Humans, Assuming Humans Are BiasedChao Yu, Jiaxuan Gao, Weilin Liu, Botian Xu et al.ICLR 2023 · 4 citations
- Diverse Conventions for Human-AI CollaborationBidipta Sarkar, Andy Shih, Dorsa SadighNeurIPS 2023 · 23 citations
