Peer Prediction for Learning Agents
Shi Feng, Fang-Yi Yu, Yiling Chen
Abstract
Peer prediction refers to a collection of mechanisms for eliciting information from human agents when direct verification of the obtained information is unavailable. They are designed to have a game-theoretic equilibrium where everyone reveals their private information truthfully. This result holds under the assumption that agents are Bayesian and they each adopt a fixed strategy across all tasks. Human agents however are observed in many domains to exhibit learning behavior in sequential settings. In this paper, we explore the dynamics of sequential peer prediction mechanisms when participants are learning agents. We first show that the notion of no regret alone for the agents' learning algorithms cannot guarantee convergence to the truthful strategy. We then focus on a family of learning algorithms where strategy updates only depend on agents' cumulative rewards and prove that agents' strategies in the popular Correlated Agreement (CA) mechanism converge to truthful reporting when they use algorithms from this family. This family of algorithms is not necessarily no-regret, but includes several familiar no-regret learning algorithms (e.g multiplicative weight update and Follow the Perturbed Leader) as special cases. Simulation of several algorithms in this family as well as the -greedy algorithm, which is outside of this family, shows convergence to the truthful strategy in the CA mechanism. A fundamental challenge in many domains is to elicit high-quality information from people when directly verifying the acquired information is not feasible, either because the ground truth is not available or because it's too costly to obtain. Notable settings include asking people to label data for machine learning, having students perform peer grading in education, and soliciting customer feedback for products and services. The peer prediction literature has made impressive progress on this challenge in the past two decades, with many mechanisms that have desirable incentive properties developed for this problem [
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a0311120-6a4e-424f-ae3d-380fb6f01545Cited by top-tier papers5
- Nash Convergence of Mean-Based Learning Algorithms in First Price AuctionsXiaotie Deng, Xinyan Hu, Tao Lin, Weiqiang ZhengWWW 2022 · 16 citations
- Equilibrium of Data Markets with ExternalitySafwan Hossain, Yiling ChenICML 2024 · 7 citations
- Carrot and Stick: Eliciting Comparison Data and BeyondYiling Chen, Shi Feng, Fang-Yi YuNeurIPS 2024 · 5 citations
- Incentive-Aligned Multi-Source LLM SummariesYanchen Jiang, Zhe Feng, Aranyak MehtaICLR 2026 · 2 citations
- Truthfulness Despite Weak Supervision: Evaluating and Training LLMs Using Peer PredictionTianyi Qiu, Micah Carroll, Cameron AllenICLR 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on4
- Dominantly Truthful Multi-task Peer Prediction with a Constant Number of TasksYuqing KongSODA 2020 · 33 citations
- Information Elicitation from Rowdy CrowdsGrant Schoenebeck, Fang-Yi Yu, Yichi ZhangWWW 2021 · 18 citations
- Nash Convergence of Mean-Based Learning Algorithms in First Price AuctionsXiaotie Deng, Xinyan Hu, Tao Lin, Weiqiang ZhengWWW 2022 · 16 citations
- Mechanisms for a No-Regret Agent: Beyond the Common PriorModibo K. Camara, Jason D. Hartline, Aleck C. JohnsenFOCS 2020 · 5 citations
Related papers
- Stochastically Dominant Peer PredictionYichi Zhang, Shengwei Xu, Grant Schoenebeck, David M. PennockNeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- Multitask Peer Prediction With Task-dependent StrategiesYichi Zhang, Grant SchoenebeckWWW 2023 · 7 citations
- Information Elicitation Mechanisms for Statistical EstimationYuqing Kong, Grant Schoenebeck, Biaoshuai Tao, Fang-Yi YuAAAI 2020 · 22 citations
- Truthful Data Acquisition via Peer PredictionYiling Chen, Yiheng Shen, Shuran ZhengNeurIPS 2020 · 35 citations
- Convergence Analysis of No-Regret Bidding Algorithms in Repeated AuctionsZhe Feng, Guru Guruganesh, Christopher Liaw, Aranyak Mehta et al.AAAI 2021 · 31 citations
