INC: An Indirect Neural Corrector for Auto-Regressive Hybrid PDE Solvers
Hao Wei, Aleksandra Franz, Björn List, Nils Thuerey
Abstract
When simulating partial differential equations, hybrid solvers combine coarse numerical solvers with learned correctors. They promise accelerated simulations while adhering to physical constraints. However, as shown in our theoretical framework, directly applying learned corrections to solver outputs leads to significant autoregressive errors, which originate from amplified perturbations that accumulate during long-term rollouts, especially in chaotic regimes. To overcome this, we propose the Indirect Neural Corrector (), which integrates learned corrections into the governing equations rather than applying direct state updates. Our key insight is that reduces the error amplification on the order of , where is the timestep and the Lipschitz constant. At the same time, our framework poses no architectural requirements and integrates seamlessly with arbitrary neural networks and solvers. We test in extensive benchmarks, covering numerous differentiable solvers, neural backbones, and test cases ranging from a 1D chaotic system to 3D turbulence. improves the long-term trajectory performance () by up to 158.7%, stabilizes blowups under aggressive coarsening, and for complex 3D turbulence cases yields speed-ups of several orders of magnitude. thus enables stable, efficient PDE emulation with formal error reduction, paving the way for faster scientific and engineering simulations with reliable physics guarantees. Our source code is available at https://github.com/tum-pbs/INC
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 9fecfc1a-375e-488f-9e4e-5861fedc4534Cited by top-tier papers2
- Proximal Splitting Methods for Hybrid Differentiable ModelsAbdel-Rahim Mezidi, Jordan Patracone, Amaury HabrardICML 2026
- ReViT: Rotational-equivariant Vision Transformers for Neural PDE SolversHao Wei, Björn List, Nils ThuereyICML 2026
Builds on12
- Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential EquationsZongyi Li, Nikola Borislavov Kovachki, Kamyar Azizzadenesheli, Burigede Liu et al.ICLR 2021 · 3,911 citations
- Learning to Simulate Complex Physics with Graph NetworksAlvaro Sanchez-Gonzalez, Jonathan Godwin, Tobias Pfaff, Rex Ying et al.ICML 2020 · 1,439 citations
- Message Passing Neural PDE SolversJohannes Brandstetter, Daniel E. Worrall, Max WellingICLR 2022 · 410 citations
- Solver-in-the-Loop: Learning from Differentiable Physics to Interact with Iterative PDE-SolversKiwon Um, Robert Brand, Yun (Raymond) Fei, Philipp Holl et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 398 citations
- Convolutional Neural Operators for robust and accurate learning of PDEsBogdan Raonic, Roberto Molinaro, Tim De Ryck, Tobias Rohner et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 292 citations
Related papers
- PRDP: Progressively Refined Differentiable PhysicsKanishk Bhatia, Felix Koehler, Nils ThuereyICLR 2025
- Hierarchical Implicit Neural EmulatorsRuoxi Jiang, Xiao Zhang, Karan Jakhar, Peter Y. Lu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 9 citations
- Hybrid Latent Representations for PDE EmulationAli Can Bekar, Siddhant Agarwal, Christian Hüttig, Nicola Tosi et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- Neural Emulator Superiority: When Machine Learning for PDEs Surpasses its Training DataFelix Koehler, Nils ThuereyNeurIPS 2025 · 8 citations
- Combining Differentiable PDE Solvers and Graph Neural Networks for Fluid Flow PredictionFilipe de Avila Belbute-Peres, Thomas D. Economon, J. Zico KolterICML 2020 · 271 citations
