Lune

FSE2020Top-tier venue

Understanding type changes in Java

Ameya Ketkar, Nikolaos Tsantalis, Danny Dig

2020Year
17Citations
7Top-tier citations

Abstract

Developers frequently change the type of a program element and update all its references for performance, security, concurrency, library migration, or better maintainability. Despite type changes being a common program transformation, it is the least automated and the least studied. With this knowledge gap, researchers miss opportunities to improve the state of the art in automation for software evolution, tool builders do not invest resources where automation is most needed, language and library designers cannot make informed decisions when introducing new types, and developers fail to use common practices when changing types. To fill this gap, we present the first large-scale and most fine-grained empirical study on type changes in Java. We develop state-of-the-art tools to statically mine 297,543 type changes and their subsequent code adaptations from a diverse corpus of 129 Java projects containing 416,652 commits. With this rich dataset we answer research questions about the practice of type changes. Among others, we found that type changes are actually more common than renamings, but the current research and tools for type changes are inadequate. Based on our extensive and reliable data, we present actionable, empirically-justified implications.

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext 9fbdb3d0-f39c-4e2c-8639-fd70fc140124

Cited by top-tier papers7

Ask how each one uses it

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines