Fine-tuned Language Models are Continual Learners
Thomas Scialom, Tuhin Chakrabarty, Smaranda Muresan
Abstract
Recent work on large language models relies on the intuition that most natural language processing tasks can be described via natural language instructions and that models trained on these instructions show strong zero-shot performance on several standard datasets. However, these models even though impressive still perform poorly on a wide range of tasks outside of their respective training and evaluation sets.To address this limitation, we argue that a model should be able to keep extending its knowledge and abilities, without forgetting previous skills. In spite of the limited success of Continual Learning, we show that Fine-tuned Language Models can be continual learners.We empirically investigate the reason for this success and conclude that Continual Learning emerges from self-supervision pre-training. Our resulting model Continual-T0 (CT0) is able to learn 8 new diverse language generation tasks, while still maintaining good performance on previous tasks, spanning in total of 70 datasets. Finally, we show that CT0 is able to combine instructions in ways it was never trained for, demonstrating some level of instruction compositionality.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 9f242d0e-be7b-496a-989d-a474043c0e96Cited by top-tier papers47
- FLASK: Fine-grained Language Model Evaluation based on Alignment Skill SetsSeonghyeon Ye, Doyoung Kim, Sungdong Kim, Hyeonbin Hwang et al.ICLR 2024 · 176 citations
- Memory-Efficient Fine-Tuning of Compressed Large Language Models via sub-4-bit Integer QuantizationJeonghoon Kim, Jung Hyun Lee, Sungdong Kim, Joonsuk Park et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 157 citations
- Learning to Discover at Test TimeMert Yuksekgonul, Daniel Koceja, Xinhao Li, Federico Bianchi et al.ICML 2026 · 73 citations
- Audio-Visual Class-Incremental LearningWeiguo Pian, Shentong Mo, Yunhui Guo, Yapeng TianICCV 2023 · 44 citations
- Learning to Compose Soft Prompts for Compositional Zero-Shot LearningNihal V. Nayak, Peilin Yu, Stephen H. BachICLR 2023 · 41 citations
Builds on16
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTTianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger et al.ICLR 2020 · 8,443 citations
- Finetuned Language Models are Zero-Shot LearnersJason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y. Zhao, Kelvin Guu et al.ICLR 2022 · 4,966 citations
- Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task GeneralizationVictor Sanh, Albert Webson, Colin Raffel, Stephen H. Bach et al.ICLR 2022 · 1,976 citations
- Cross-Task Generalization via Natural Language Crowdsourcing InstructionsSwaroop Mishra, Daniel Khashabi, Chitta Baral, Hannaneh HajishirziACL 2022 · 887 citations
Related papers
- Large-scale Lifelong Learning of In-context Instructions and How to Tackle ItJisoo Mok, Jaeyoung Do, Sungjin Lee, Tara Taghavi et al.ACL 2023 · 3 citations
- Progressive Prompts: Continual Learning for Language ModelsAnastasia Razdaibiedina, Yuning Mao, Rui Hou, Madian Khabsa et al.ICLR 2023 · 15 citations
- Pretrained Vision-Language-Action Models are Surprisingly Resistant to Forgetting in Continual LearningHuihan Liu, Changyeon Kim, Bo Liu, Minghuan Liu et al.ICML 2026 · 14 citations
- Compositional Task Representations for Large Language ModelsNan Shao, Zefan Cai, Hanwei Xu, Chonghua Liao et al.ICLR 2023
- From f(x) and g(x) to f(g(x)): LLMs Learn New Skills in RL by Composing Old OnesLifan Yuan, Weize Chen, Yuchen Zhang, Ganqu Cui et al.ICLR 2026 · 46 citations
