Diffusion Models Preferentially Memorize Prototypical Examples or: Why Does My Diffusion Model Love Slop?
Marta Aparicio Rodriguez, Anastasia Borovykh, Grigorios A Pavliotis, Daniel Korchinski
Abstract
Generative models have a persistent limitation: their tendency to memorize training data can create legal liabilities and erode creative diversity. Understanding which samples are memorized in whole or in part, and under what conditions, therefore remains an important open problem. Here we answer the question "Are atypical or rare samples memorized first?" in the negative. We train diffusion models on strings generated according to the production rules of the Random Hierarchy Model (RHM), and find that samples composed of common substrings are preferentially memorized. This holds true even if the training data consists of entirely unique samples, indicating that deduplication at the data point level does not provide a meaningful privacy guarantee. Correspondingly we predict, then observe, delayed memorization for fat-tailed datasets (i.e., those with more atypical samples). This effect is amplified when fat-tails are introduced into high-level production rules. These together suggest that dataset diversity , particularly at higher levels of abstraction, plays an important role in staving off memorization. Finally, we identify an intermediate regime of partial memorization in which common substrings are learned first and subsequently overproduced during generation. If training is stopped in this regime, models will exhibit the reversion-to-the-mean blandness often derided as "slop".
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 9ee665d4-1d14-4aa1-a6d8-a125e98a989eBuilds on26
- Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic ModelsJonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, Pieter AbbeelNeurIPS 2020 · 35,902 citations
- High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion ModelsRobin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser et al.CVPR 2022 · 13,123 citations
- Denoising Diffusion Implicit ModelsJiaming Song, Chenlin Meng, Stefano ErmonICLR 2021 · 11,743 citations
- Video Diffusion ModelsJonathan Ho, Tim Salimans, Alexey A. Gritsenko, William Chan et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 2,948 citations
- Extracting Training Data from Large Language ModelsNicholas Carlini, Florian Tramèr, Eric Wallace, Matthew Jagielski et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 2,866 citations
Related papers
- Does Generation Require Memorization? Creative Diffusion Models using Ambient DiffusionKulin Shah, Alkis Kalavasis, Adam R. Klivans, Giannis DarasICML 2025
- On the Edge of Memorization in Diffusion ModelsSam Buchanan, Druv Pai, Yi Ma, Valentin De BortoliNeurIPS 2025 · 25 citations
- Extracting Training Data from Diffusion ModelsNicholas Carlini, Jamie Hayes, Milad Nasr, Matthew Jagielski et al.USENIX Security 2023
- Finding NeMo: Localizing Neurons Responsible For Memorization in Diffusion ModelsDominik Hintersdorf, Lukas Struppek, Kristian Kersting, Adam Dziedzic et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 46 citations
- The Emergence of Reproducibility and Consistency in Diffusion ModelsHuijie Zhang, Jinfan Zhou, Yifu Lu, Minzhe Guo et al.ICML 2024 · 51 citations
