Embodied Navigation in Immersive Abstract Data Visualization: Is Overview+Detail or Zooming Better for 3D Scatterplots?
Yalong Yang, Maxime Cordeil, Johanna Beyer, Tim Dwyer, Kim Marriott, Hanspeter Pfister
Abstract
data has no natural scale and so interactive data visualizations must provide techniques to allow the user to choose their viewpoint and scale. Such techniques are well established in desktop visualization tools. The two most common techniques are zoom+pan and overview+detail. However, how best to enable the analyst to navigate and view abstract data at different levels of scale in immersive environments has not previously been studied. We report the findings of the first systematic study of immersive navigation techniques for 3D scatterplots. We tested four conditions that represent our best attempt to adapt standard 2D navigation techniques to data visualization in an immersive environment while still providing standard immersive navigation techniques through physical movement and teleportation. We compared room-sized visualization versus a zooming interface, each with and without an overview. We find significant differences in participants' response times and accuracy for a number of standard visual analysis tasks. Both zoom and overview provide benefits over standard locomotion support alone (i.e., physical movement and pointer teleportation). However, which variation is superior, depends on the task. We obtain a more nuanced understanding of the results by analyzing them in terms of a time-cost model for the different components of navigation: way-finding, travel, number of travel steps, and context switching.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 9edb2800-69c8-465d-9643-cca3cae68839Cited by top-tier papers12
- Grand Challenges in Immersive AnalyticsBarrett Ens, Benjamin Bach, Maxime Cordeil, Ulrich Engelke et al.CHI 2021 · 220 citations
- VIRD: Immersive Match Video Analysis for High-Performance Badminton CoachingTica Lin, Alexandre Aouididi, Chen Zhu-Tian, Johanna Beyer et al.IEEE VIS 2023 · 31 citations
- Towards an Understanding of Distributed Asymmetric Collaborative Visualization on Problem-solvingWai Tong, Meng Xia, Kamkwai Wong, Doug A. Bowman et al.IEEE VR 2023 · 30 citations
- Evaluating Navigation and Comparison Performance of Computational Notebooks on Desktop and in Virtual RealitySungwon In, Eric Krokos, Kirsten Whitley, Chris North et al.CHI 2024 · 17 citations
- The Pattern is in the Details: An Evaluation of Interaction Techniques for Locating, Searching, and Contextualizing Details in Multivariate Matrix VisualizationsYalong Yang, Wenyu Xia, Fritz Lekschas, Carolina Nobre et al.CHI 2022 · 15 citations
Related papers
- Precise Embodied Data Selection with Haptic Feedback while Retaining Room-Scale Visualisation ContextShaozhang Dai, Yi Li, Barrett Ens, Lonni Besançon et al.IEEE VIS 2024 · 4 citations
- Comparing Scatterplot Variants for Temporal Trends Visualization in Immersive Virtual EnvironmentsCarlos Quijano-Chavez, Luciana P. Nedel, Carla M. D. S. FreitasIEEE VR 2023 · 4 citations
- Designing for Wayfinding in VR: Linking Navigation Interfaces to Spatial Learning and Cognitive MappingArmin Mostafavi, Zhiwen Qiu, Tong Bill Xu, Wenqian Niu et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Minimalism or Creative Chaos? On the Arrangement and Analysis of Numerous Scatterplots in Immersive 3D Knowledge SpacesMelanie Derksen, Torsten W. Kuhlen, Mario Botsch, Tim WeisskerIEEE VR 2025 · 1 citation
- Evaluation of Visual Feedback Techniques for Mid-Air Teleportation in an Immersive EnvironmentNanjia Wang, Saadman Rahman, Brody Wells, Daniel Zielasko et al.IEEE VR 2026
