Diagnose, Correct, and Learn from Manipulation Failures via Visual Symbols
Xianchao Zeng, Xinyu Zhou, Youcheng Li, Jiayou Shi, Tianle Li, Liangming Chen, Lei Ren, Yong-Lu Li
Abstract
Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have recently achieved remarkable progress in robotic manipulation, yet they remain limited in failure diagnosis and learning from failures. Additionally, existing failure datasets are mostly generated programmatically in simulation, which limits their generalization to the real world. In light of these, we introduce ViFailback, a framework designed to diagnose robotic manipulation failures and provide both textual and visual correction guidance. Our framework utilizes explicit visual symbols to enhance annotation efficiency. We further release the ViFailback dataset, a large-scale collection of 58,126 Visual Question Answering (VQA) pairs along with their corresponding 5,202 real-world manipulation trajectories. Based on the dataset, we establish ViFailback-Bench, a benchmark of 11 fine-grained VQA tasks designed to assess the failure diagnosis and correction abilities of Vision-Language Models (VLMs), featuring ViFailback-Bench Lite for closed-ended and ViFailback-Bench Hard for open-ended evaluation. To demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework, we built the ViFailback-8B VLM, which not only achieves significant overall performance improvement on ViFailback-Bench but also generates visual symbols for corrective action guidance. Finally, by integrating ViFailback-8B with a VLA model, we conduct real-world robotic experiments demonstrating its ability to assist the VLA model in recovering from failures. Project Website: https://x1nyuzhou.github.io/vifailback.github.io/
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 9ed4a1fd-8440-4556-b9f4-fa94d5f1ae7cBuilds on12
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- 6-DOF GraspNet: Variational Grasp Generation for Object ManipulationArsalan Mousavian, Clemens Eppner, Dieter FoxICCV 2019 · 673 citations
- RT-Trajectory: Robotic Task Generalization via Hindsight Trajectory SketchesJiayuan Gu, Sean Kirmani, Paul Wohlhart, Yao Lu et al.ICLR 2024 · 135 citations
- SAFE: Multitask Failure Detection for Vision-Language-Action ModelsQiao Gu, Yuanliang Ju, Shengxiang Sun, Igor Gilitschenski et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 103 citations
Related papers
- AHA: A Vision-Language-Model for Detecting and Reasoning Over Failures in Robotic ManipulationJiafei Duan, Wilbert Pumacay, Nishanth Kumar, Yi Ru Wang et al.ICLR 2025 · 4 citations
- Can VLMs Diagnose and Recover from VLA Manipulation Faults?Bowen Yan, Jiahao Xiao, Kehui Liu, Jianbo Zhang et al.ICML 2026
- RoboFailRing: Retrieval-Augmented and Language Grounding Failure Detection for VLM-enabled Robotic ManipulationChenduo Ying, Linkang Du, Yuanchao Shu, Peng ChengACL 2026
- FLARE: A Failure-Aware Framework for Autonomous Correction and Recovery in Visual-Language Robotic ManipulationGanlong Zhao, Zijia Tang, Xingping Chen, Zhanghui Kuang et al.CVPR 2026 · 10 citations
- INSIGHT Bench: Towards Grounded IN-SItu Guidance for Robotic ManipulaTionSeonho Kim, Junhyeong Hong, Kyungjae Lee, Yoonseon OhCVPR 2026
