Measuring the Intrinsic Dimension of Earth Representations
Arjun Rao, Marc Rußwurm, Konstantin Klemmer, Esther Rolf
Abstract
Within the context of representation learning for Earth observation, geographic Implicit Neural Representations (INRs) embed low-dimensional location inputs (longitude, latitude) into high-dimensional embeddings, through models trained on geo-referenced satellite, image or text data. Despite the common aim of geographic INRs to distill Earth's data into compact, learning-friendly representations, we lack an understanding of how much information is contained in these Earth representations, and where that information is concentrated. The intrinsic dimension of a dataset measures the number of degrees of freedom required to capture its local variability, regardless of the ambient high-dimensional space in which it is embedded. This work provides the first study of the intrinsic dimensionality of geographic INRs. Analyzing INRs with ambient dimension between 256 and 512, we find that their intrinsic dimensions fall roughly between 2 and 10 and are sensitive to changing spatial resolution and input modalities during INR pre-training. Furthermore, we show that the intrinsic dimension of a geographic INR correlates with downstream task performance and can capture spatial artifacts, facilitating model evaluation and diagnostics. More broadly, our work offers an architecture-agnostic, label-free metric of information content that can enable unsupervised evaluation, model selection, and pre-training design across INRs.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers2
- Localized, High-resolution Geographic Representations with Slepian FunctionsArjun Rao, Ruth Crasto, Tessa Ooms, David Rolnick et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
- Automatic Layer Selection for Hallucination DetectionXinpeng Wang, William Cao, Andrew Wilson, Zhe ZengICML 2026 · 2 citations
Builds on18
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- Implicit Neural Representations with Periodic Activation FunctionsVincent Sitzmann, Julien N. P. Martel, Alexander W. Bergman, David B. Lindell et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 4,008 citations
- CLUB: A Contrastive Log-ratio Upper Bound of Mutual InformationPengyu Cheng, Weituo Hao, Shuyang Dai, Jiachang Liu et al.ICML 2020 · 512 citations
- The Intrinsic Dimension of Images and Its Impact on LearningPhillip Pope, Chen Zhu, Ahmed Abdelkader, Micah Goldblum et al.ICLR 2021 · 381 citations
- Scale-MAE: A Scale-Aware Masked Autoencoder for Multiscale Geospatial Representation LearningColorado J. Reed, Ritwik Gupta, Shufan Li, Sarah Brockman et al.ICCV 2023 · 373 citations
Related papers
- Geometric Signatures of Compositionality Across a Language Model's LifetimeJin Hwa Lee, Thomas Jiralerspong, Lei Yu, Yoshua Bengio et al.ACL 2025
- Bridging Information-Theoretic and Geometric Compression in Language ModelsEmily Cheng, Corentin Kervadec, Marco BaroniEMNLP 2023 · 5 citations
- SatCLIP: Global, General-Purpose Location Embeddings with Satellite ImageryKonstantin Klemmer, Esther Rolf, Caleb Robinson, Lester Mackey et al.AAAI 2025 · 173 citations
- No Location Left Behind: Measuring and Improving the Fairness of Implicit Representations for Earth DataDaniel Cai, Randall BalestrieroICLR 2025
- SINR: Sparsity Driven Compressed Implicit Neural RepresentationsDhananjaya Jayasundara, Sudarshan Rajagopalan, Yasiru Ranasinghe, Trac D. Tran et al.CVPR 2025
