Quality Assessment of Image Super-Resolution: Balancing Deterministic and Statistical Fidelity
Wei Zhou, Zhou Wang
Abstract
There has been a growing interest in developing image super-resolution (SR) algorithms that convert low-resolution (LR) to higher resolution images, but automatically evaluating the visual quality of super-resolved images remains a challenging problem. Here we look at the problem of SR image quality assessment (SR IQA) in a two-dimensional (2D) space of deterministic fidelity (DF) versus statistical fidelity (SF). This allows us to better understand the advantages and disadvantages of existing SR algorithms, which produce images at different clusters in the 2D space of (DF, SF). Specifically, we observe an interesting trend from more traditional SR algorithms that are typically inclined to optimize for DF while losing SF, to more recent generative adversarial network (GAN) based approaches that by contrast exhibit strong advantages in achieving high SF but sometimes appear weak at maintaining DF. Furthermore, we propose an uncertainty weighting scheme based on content-dependent sharpness and texture assessment that merges the two fidelity measures into an overall quality prediction named the Super Resolution Image Fidelity (SRIF) index, which demonstrates superior performance against state-of-the-art IQA models when tested on subject-rated datasets.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 9e94b576-3416-4c17-8437-870a2c1a0feeCited by top-tier papers5
- Bridging the Perception Gap in Image Super-Resolution EvaluationShaolin Su, Josep M. Rocafort, Danna Xue, David Serrano-Lozano et al.CVPR 2026 · 4 citations
- Temporal Inconsistency Guidance for Super-resolution Video Quality AssessmentYixiao Li, Xiaoyuan Yang, Weide Liu, Xin Jin et al.AAAI 2026 · 3 citations
- Revisiting MLLM Based Image Quality Assessment: Errors and RemedyZhenchen Tang, Songlin Yang, Bo Peng, Zichuan Wang et al.AAAI 2026 · 2 citations
- Teaching Large Language Models to Regress Accurate Image Quality Scores Using Score DistributionZhiyuan You, Xin Cai, Jinjin Gu, Tianfan Xue et al.CVPR 2025
- Toward Generalized Image Quality Assessment: Relaxing the Perfect Reference Quality AssumptionDu Chen, Tianhe Wu, Kede Ma, Lei ZhangCVPR 2025
Builds on3
- Self-feature Learning: An Efficient Deep Lightweight Network for Image Super-resolutionJun Xiao, Qian Ye, Rui Zhao, Kin-Man Lam et al.ACM MM 2021 · 17 citations
- Dual-view Attention Networks for Single Image Super-ResolutionJingcai Guo, Shiheng Ma, Jie Zhang, Qihua Zhou et al.ACM MM 2020 · 15 citations
- From Patches to Pictures (PaQ-2-PiQ): Mapping the Perceptual Space of Picture QualityZhenqiang Ying, Haoran Niu, Praful Gupta, Dhruv Mahajan et al.CVPR 2020
Related papers
- Graph-Perceptron with Semantic Fidelity for No-Reference Super-Resolution Image Quality AssessmentLei ChenACM MM 2025
- Exploring Semantic Feature Discrimination for Perceptual Image Super-Resolution and Opinion-Unaware No-Reference Image Quality AssessmentGuanglu Dong, Xiangyu Liao, Mingyang Li, Guihuan Guo et al.CVPR 2025
- Uncertainty-Aware GAN for Single Image Super ResolutionChenxi MaAAAI 2024 · 19 citations
- Augmenting Perceptual Super-Resolution via Image Quality PredictorsFengjia Zhang, Samrudhdhi B. Rangrej, Tristan Aumentado-Armstrong, Afsaneh Fazly et al.CVPR 2025
- RankSRGAN: Generative Adversarial Networks With Ranker for Image Super-ResolutionWenlong Zhang, Yihao Liu, Chao Dong, Yu QiaoICCV 2019 · 406 citations
