Testing matrix product states
Mehdi Soleimanifar, John Wright
Abstract
Matrix product states (MPS) are a class of physically-relevant quantum states which arise in the study of quantum many-body systems. A quantum state |ψ 1,...,n ∈ C d1 ⊗ • • • ⊗ C dn comprised of n qudits is said to be an MPS of bond dimension r if the reduced density matrix ψ 1,...,k has rank r for each k ∈ 1, . . . , n. When r = 1, this corresponds to the set of product states, i.e. states of the form |ψ 1 ⊗ • • • ⊗ |ψ n , which possess no entanglement. For larger values of r, this yields a more expressive class of quantum states, which are allowed to possess limited amounts of entanglement.
Devising schemes for testing the amount of entanglement in quantum systems has played a crucial role in quantum computing and information theory. In this work, we study the problem of testing whether an unknown state |ψ is an MPS in the property testing model. In this model, one is given m identical copies of |ψ , and the goal is to determine whether |ψ is an MPS of bond dimension r or whether |ψ is far from all such states. For the case of product states, we study the product test, a simple two-copy test previously analyzed by Harrow and Montanaro [HM13], and a key ingredient in their proof that QMA(2) = QMA(k) for k ≥ 2. We give a new and simpler analysis of the product test which achieves an optimal bound for a wide range of parameters, answering open problems in [HM13] and [MdW13]. For the case of r ≥ 2, we give an efficient algorithm for testing whether |ψ is an MPS of bond dimension r using m = O(nr 2 ) copies, independent of the dimensions of the qudits, and we show that Ω(n 1/2 ) copies are necessary for this task. This lower bound shows that a dependence on the number of qudits n is necessary, in sharp contrast to the case of product states where a constant number of copies suffices.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 9e7226ed-a988-417b-8043-cd198d2769e0Cited by top-tier papers4
- The Power of Unentangled Quantum Proofs with Non-negative AmplitudesFernando Granha Jeronimo, Pei WuSTOC 2023 · 6 citations
- Polynomial-Time Tolerant Testing Stabilizer StatesSrinivasan Arunachalam, Arkopal DuttSTOC 2025 · 4 citations
- The State Hidden Subgroup Problem and an Efficient Algorithm for Locating UnentanglementAdam Bouland, Tudor Giurgica-Tiron, John WrightSTOC 2025 · 2 citations
- Learning the Closest Product StateAinesh Bakshi, John Bostanci, William Kretschmer, Zeph Landau et al.STOC 2025 · 1 citation
Builds on1
Related papers
- Single-Copy Stabilizer TestingMarcel Hinsche, Jonas HelsenSTOC 2025 · 3 citations
- Model Checking Matrix Product States Against Linear Chain LogicMing Xu, Yihao Chen, Ji GuanCAV 2026
- Entanglement is Necessary for Optimal Quantum Property TestingSébastien Bubeck, Sitan Chen, Jerry LiFOCS 2020 · 33 citations
- Testing and Learning Quantum Juntas Nearly OptimallyThomas Chen, Shivam Nadimpalli, Henry YuenSODA 2023 · 18 citations
- Realizing Quantum Kernel Models at Scale with Matrix Product State SimulationMekena Metcalf, Pablo Andrés-Martínez, Nathan FitzpatrickSC 2024 · 3 citations
