N-agent Ad Hoc Teamwork
Caroline Wang, Arrasy Rahman, Ishan Durugkar, Elad Liebman, Peter Stone
Abstract
Current approaches to learning cooperative multi-agent behaviors assume relatively restrictive settings. In fully cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning, the learning algorithm controls all agents in the scenario, while in ad hoc teamwork, the learning algorithm usually assumes control over only a single agent in the scenario. However, many cooperative settings in the real world are much less restrictive. For example, in an autonomous driving scenario, a company might train its cars to cooperate with each other, yet once on the road, these cars must additionally cooperate with cars from other companies. Towards expanding the class of scenarios that cooperative learning methods may optimally address, this research agenda introduces and proposes to study N-agent ad hoc teamwork (NAHT), where a set of autonomous agents must interact and cooperate with dynamically varying numbers and types of teammates.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 9dce947e-19bb-41c5-bcd1-8038df9f0011Cited by top-tier papers3
- Breaking the Performance Ceiling in Reinforcement Learning requires Inference StrategiesFélix Chalumeau, Daniel Rajaonarivonivelomanantsoa, Ruan John de Kock, Juan Claude Formanek et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- LLM-Assisted Semantically Diverse Teammate Generation for Efficient Multi-agent CoordinationLihe Li, Lei Yuan, Pengsen Liu, Tao Jiang et al.ICML 2025
- IEC: When Information-Driven Exploration Meets Spectral Consensus via Primal–Dual Reward Regularization in Decentralized Multi-Agent RLXuefeng Du, Jiajun Wu, Yuduo Zheng, Fengqi LiICML 2026
Builds on12
- Emergent Tool Use From Multi-Agent AutocurriculaBowen Baker, Ingmar Kanitscheider, Todor M. Markov, Yi Wu et al.ICLR 2020 · 751 citations
- Graph Convolutional Reinforcement LearningJiechuan Jiang, Chen Dun, Tiejun Huang, Zongqing LuICLR 2020 · 415 citations
- "Other-Play" for Zero-Shot CoordinationHengyuan Hu, Adam Lerer, Alex Peysakhovich, Jakob N. FoersterICML 2020 · 271 citations
- Collaborating with Humans without Human DataDJ Strouse, Kevin R. McKee, Matt M. Botvinick, Edward Hughes et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 239 citations
- Scaling Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Selective Parameter SharingFilippos Christianos, Georgios Papoudakis, Arrasy Rahman, Stefano V. AlbrechtICML 2021 · 165 citations
Related papers
- Online Ad Hoc Teamwork under Partial ObservabilityPengjie Gu, Mengchen Zhao, Jianye Hao, Bo AnICLR 2022 · 35 citations
- On the Impossibility of Learning to Cooperate with Adaptive Partner Strategies in Repeated GamesRobert Tyler Loftin, Frans A. OliehoekICML 2022 · 4 citations
- Ad Hoc Teamwork via Offline Goal-Based Decision TransformersXinzhi Zhang, Hohei Chan, Deheng Ye, Yi Cai et al.ICML 2025
- Towards Open Ad Hoc Teamwork Using Graph-based Policy LearningArrasy Rahman, Niklas Höpner, Filippos Christianos, Stefano V. AlbrechtICML 2021 · 75 citations
- Open Ad Hoc Teamwork with Cooperative Game TheoryJianhong Wang, Yang Li, Yuan Zhang, Wei Pan et al.ICML 2024 · 5 citations
