Outrunning LLM Cutoffs: A Live Kernel Crash Resolution Benchmark for All
Chenxi Huang, Alex Mathai, Feiyang Yu, Aleksandr Nogikh, Petros Maniatis, Franjo Ivancic, Eugene Wu, Kostis Kaffes, Junfeng Yang, Baishakhi Ray
Abstract
Repairing system crashes discovered by kernel fuzzers like Syzkaller is a critical yet underexplored challenge in software engineering. While recent works have introduced Large Language Model (LLM) based agents for Linux kernel crash-resolution, their evaluation benchmarks are usually static and thus, do not capture the evolving nature of the Linux kernel, and suffer from potential data contamination due to LLM knowledge cutoffs. To address the above problem, we present (i) Live-kBench, an evaluation framework for self-evolving benchmarks that continuously scrapes and evaluates agents on freshly discovered kernel bugs, and (ii) kEnv, an agent-agnostic standardized crash-resolution environment for kernel compilation, execution, and feedback. This design decouples agent workflows from heavy-weight execution, enabling fair and scalable comparison across diverse agent frameworks under identical conditions. To this end, we curate an inaugural dataset of 534 Linux kernel bugs and empirically demonstrate a significant performance gap, with agents achieving up to 25% higher equivalent patch rate on bugs fixed before the LLM knowledge cutoff. Using kEnv, we benchmark three state-of-the-art agents, showing that they resolve 74% of crashes on the first attempt (plausible patches); however only 20% of generated patches closely match developer fixes. Additionally, exposing crash resolution feedback improves crash resolution rate by 29%. Live-kBench provides the community with an evaluation infrastructure for self-evolving benchmarks that is both time and attribute sensitive; complete with a public dashboard to track agent progress on Linux kernel bugs.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 9dc60516-1867-4bfa-bf07-e3e9eb125e27Builds on2
- SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software EngineeringJohn Yang, Carlos E. Jimenez, Alexander Wettig, Kilian Lieret et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 2,059 citations
- OpenHands: An Open Platform for AI Software Developers as Generalist AgentsXingyao Wang, Boxuan Li, Yufan Song, Frank F. Xu et al.ICLR 2025 · 7 citations
Related papers
- LLM-based Agents for Automated Bug Fixing: How Far Are We?Xiangxin Meng, Zexiong Ma, Pengfei Gao, Chao PengICSE 2026
- Taming System Complexity: Demystifying Software Engineering Agents in Diagnosing Linux Kernel FaultsZhenhao Zhou, Zhuochen Huang, Yike He, Chong Wang et al.ACL 2026 · 5 citations
- SEC-bench: Automated Benchmarking of LLM Agents on Real-World Software Security TasksHwiwon Lee, Ziqi Zhang, Hanxiao Lu, Lingming ZhangNeurIPS 2025 · 86 citations
- pPatch: Automated Vulnerability UnpatchingTianyi Jing, Pengyu Ding, Meng Xu, Yinhao Hu et al.FSE 2026
- Can Agent Fix Agent Issues?Alfin Wijaya Rahardja, Junwei Liu, Weitong Chen, Zhenpeng Chen et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
