Two-Stage Fine-Tuning for Improved Bias and Variance for Large Pretrained Language Models
Lijing Wang, Yingya Li, Timothy Miller, Steven Bethard, Guergana Savova
Abstract
The bias-variance tradeoff is the idea that learning methods need to balance model complexity with data size to minimize both under-fitting and over-fitting. Recent empirical work and theoretical analysis with over-parameterized neural networks challenges the classic bias-variance trade-off notion suggesting that no such trade-off holds: as the width of the network grows, bias monotonically decreases while variance initially increases followed by a decrease. In this work, we first provide a variance decomposition-based justification criteria to examine whether large pretrained neural models in a fine-tuning setting are generalizable enough to have low bias and variance. We then perform theoretical and empirical analysis using ensemble methods explicitly designed to decrease variance due to optimization. This results in essentially a two-stage fine-tuning algorithm that first ratchets down bias and variance iteratively, and then uses a selected fixed-bias model to further reduce variance due to optimization by ensembling. We also analyze the nature of variance change with the ensemble size in low- and high-resource classes. Empirical results show that this two-stage method obtains strong results on SuperGLUE tasks and clinical information extraction tasks. Code and settings are available: https://github.com/christa60/bias-var-fine-tuning-plms.git
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 9db94eb4-4b6d-4010-a101-df9f5cc41d75Cited by top-tier papers3
- Model Fusion through Bayesian Optimization in Language Model Fine-TuningChaeyun Jang, Hyungi Lee, Jungtaek Kim, Juho LeeNeurIPS 2024 · 8 citations
- On Sensitivity of Learning with Limited Labelled Data to the Effects of Randomness: Impact of Interactions and Systematic ChoicesBranislav Pecher, Ivan Srba, Mária BielikováEMNLP 2024 · 1 citation
- VerifyMatch: A Semi-Supervised Learning Paradigm for Natural Language Inference with Confidence-Aware MixUpSeoyeon Park, Cornelia CarageaEMNLP 2024 · 1 citation
Builds on3
- On the Stability of Fine-tuning BERT: Misconceptions, Explanations, and Strong BaselinesMarius Mosbach, Maksym Andriushchenko, Dietrich KlakowICLR 2021 · 448 citations
- Wisdom of the Ensemble: Improving Consistency of Deep Learning ModelsLijing Wang, Dipanjan Ghosh, Maria Teresa Gonzalez Diaz, Ahmed K. Farahat et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 16 citations
- GLM: General Language Model Pretraining with Autoregressive Blank InfillingZhengxiao Du, Yujie Qian, Xiao Liu, Ming Ding et al.ACL 2022
Related papers
- On Bias-Variance Alignment in Deep ModelsLin Chen, Michal Lukasik, Wittawat Jitkrittum, Chong You et al.ICLR 2024 · 8 citations
- Understanding Double Descent Requires A Fine-Grained Bias-Variance DecompositionBen Adlam, Jeffrey PenningtonNeurIPS 2020 · 111 citations
- Rethinking Bias-Variance Trade-off for Generalization of Neural NetworksZitong Yang, Yaodong Yu, Chong You, Jacob Steinhardt et al.ICML 2020 · 219 citations
- Double Trouble in Double Descent: Bias and Variance(s) in the Lazy RegimeStéphane d'Ascoli, Maria Refinetti, Giulio Biroli, Florent KrzakalaICML 2020 · 163 citations
- Early Stopping in Deep Networks: Double Descent and How to Eliminate itReinhard Heckel, Fatih Furkan YilmazICLR 2021 · 55 citations
