Lune

ACL2026Top-tier venue

INFACT: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Induced Faithfulness and Factuality Hallucinations in Video-LLMs

Junqi Yang, Yuecong Min, Jie Zhang, Shiguang Shan, Xilin Chen

2026Year
7Citations
3Top-tier citations

Abstract

Despite rapid progress, Video Large Language Models (Video-LLMs) remain unreliable due to hallucinations, which are outputs that contradict either video evidence (faithfulness) or verifiable world knowledge (factuality). Existing benchmarks provide limited coverage of factuality hallucinations and predominantly evaluate models only in clean settings. We introduce INFACT, a diagnostic benchmark comprising 9,800 QA instances with fine-grained taxonomies for faithfulness and factuality, spanning real and synthetic videos. INFACT evaluates models in four modes: Base (clean), Visual Degradation, Evidence Corruption, and Temporal Intervention for order-sensitive items. Reliability under induced modes is quantified using Resist Rate (RR) and Temporal Sensitivity Score (TSS). Experiments on 14 representative Video-LLMs reveal that higher Base-mode accuracy does not reliably translate to higher reliability in the induced modes, with evidence corruption reducing stability and temporal intervention yielding the largest degradation. Notably, many open-source baselines exhibit near-zero TSS on factuality, indicating pronounced temporal inertia on order-sensitive questions.

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext 9d830227-df7c-475e-a78e-68afa87eb74b

Cited by top-tier papers3

Ask how each one uses it

Builds on9

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines