Be Careful What You Smooth For: Label Smoothing Can Be a Privacy Shield but Also a Catalyst for Model Inversion Attacks
Lukas Struppek, Dominik Hintersdorf, Kristian Kersting
Abstract
Label smoothing -- using softened labels instead of hard ones -- is a widely adopted regularization method for deep learning, showing diverse benefits such as enhanced generalization and calibration. Its implications for preserving model privacy, however, have remained unexplored. To fill this gap, we investigate the impact of label smoothing on model inversion attacks (MIAs), which aim to generate class-representative samples by exploiting the knowledge encoded in a classifier, thereby inferring sensitive information about its training data. Through extensive analyses, we uncover that traditional label smoothing fosters MIAs, thereby increasing a model's privacy leakage. Even more, we reveal that smoothing with negative factors counters this trend, impeding the extraction of class-related information and leading to privacy preservation, beating state-of-the-art defenses. This establishes a practical and powerful novel way for enhancing model resilience against MIAs.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 9d1a2da3-f256-4f67-835c-1feca3fd0fb0Cited by top-tier papers11
- Pseudo-Private Data Guided Model Inversion AttacksXiong Peng, Bo Han, Feng Liu, Tongliang Liu et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 12 citations
- Trap-MID: Trapdoor-based Defense against Model Inversion AttacksZhenTing Liu, ShangTse ChenNeurIPS 2024 · 12 citations
- Little Is Enough: Boosting Privacy by Sharing Only Hard Labels in Federated Semi-Supervised LearningAmr Abourayya, Jens Kleesiek, Kanishka Rao, Erman Ayday et al.AAAI 2025 · 4 citations
- Generative Model Inversion Through the Lens of the Manifold HypothesisXiong Peng, Bo Han, Fengfei Yu, Tongliang Liu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
- Do Vision-Language Models Leak What They Learn? Adaptive Token-Weighted Model Inversion AttacksNgoc-Bao Nguyen, Sy-Tuyen Ho, Koh Jun Hao, Ngai-Man CheungCVPR 2026 · 2 citations
Builds on18
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIsFlorian Tramèr, Fan Zhang, Ari Juels, Michael K. Reiter et al.USENIX Security 2016 · 2,088 citations
- Does label smoothing mitigate label noise?Michal Lukasik, Srinadh Bhojanapalli, Aditya Krishna Menon, Sanjiv KumarICML 2020 · 411 citations
- Variational Model Inversion AttacksKuan-Chieh Wang, Yan Fu, Ke Li, Ashish Khisti et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 142 citations
Related papers
- When Does Data Augmentation Help With Membership Inference Attacks?Yigitcan Kaya, Tudor DumitrasICML 2021 · 82 citations
- Rank Matters: Understanding and Defending Model Inversion Attacks via Low-Rank Feature FilteringHongyao Yu, Yixiang Qiu, Hao Fang, Tianqu Zhuang et al.KDD 2026 · 2 citations
- Model Inversion Robustness: Can Transfer Learning Help?Sy-Tuyen Ho, Koh Jun Hao, Keshigeyan Chandrasegaran, Ngoc-Bao Nguyen et al.CVPR 2024
- RelaxLoss: Defending Membership Inference Attacks without Losing UtilityDingfan Chen, Ning Yu, Mario FritzICLR 2022 · 61 citations
- Improving Robustness to Model Inversion Attacks via Mutual Information RegularizationTianhao Wang, Yuheng Zhang, Ruoxi JiaAAAI 2021 · 98 citations
