Agentic Reward Modeling: Integrating Human Preferences with Verifiable Correctness Signals for Reliable Reward Systems
Hao Peng, Yunjia Qi, Xiaozhi Wang, Zijun Yao, Bin Xu, Lei Hou, Juanzi Li
Abstract
Reward models (RMs) are crucial for the training and inference-time scaling up of large language models (LLMs). However, existing reward models primarily focus on human preferences, neglecting verifiable correctness signals which have shown strong potential in training LLMs. In this paper, we propose agentic reward modeling, a reward system that combines reward models with verifiable correctness signals from different aspects to provide reliable rewards. We empirically implement a reward agent, named REWARDAGENT, that combines human preference rewards with two verifiable signals: factuality and instruction following, to provide more reliable rewards. We conduct comprehensive experiments on existing reward model benchmarks and inference time best-of-n searches on real-world downstream tasks. RE-WARDAGENT significantly outperforms vanilla reward models, demonstrating its effectiveness. We further construct training preference pairs using REWARDAGENT and train an LLM with the DPO objective, achieving superior performance on various NLP benchmarks compared to conventional reward models. Our codes are publicly released to facilitate further research 1 .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 9cf81aee-6f91-402b-be3e-1dce16c8b959Cited by top-tier papers17
- OpenRubrics: Towards Scalable Synthetic Rubric Generation for Reward Modeling and LLM AlignmentTianci Liu, Ran Xu, Tony Yu, Ilgee Hong et al.ACL 2026 · 75 citations
- ToolOrchestra: Elevating Intelligence via Efficient Model and Tool OrchestrationHongjin SU, Shizhe Diao, Ximing Lu, Mingjie Liu et al.ICML 2026 · 34 citations
- VerIF: Verification Engineering for Reinforcement Learning in Instruction FollowingHao Peng, Yunjia Qi, Xiaozhi Wang, Bin Xu et al.EMNLP 2025 · 24 citations
- Learning to Reason for FactualityXilun Chen, Ilia Kulikov, Vincent-Pierre Berges, Barlas Oğuz et al.ICML 2026 · 22 citations
- Incentivizing Agentic Reasoning in LLM Judges via Tool-Integrated Reinforcement LearningRan Xu, Jingjing Chen, Jiayu Ye, Yu Wu et al.ICLR 2026 · 17 citations
Builds on19
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-FeedbackAman Madaan, Niket Tandon, Prakhar Gupta, Skyler Hallinan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 4,972 citations
- TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human FalsehoodsStephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, Owain EvansACL 2022 · 3,228 citations
- Scaling Laws for Reward Model OveroptimizationLeo Gao, John Schulman, Jacob HiltonICML 2023 · 963 citations
Related papers
- ProRe: A Proactive Reward System for GUI Agents via Reasoner-Actor CollaborationGaole Dai, Shiqi Jiang, Ting Cao, Yuqing Yang et al.ICLR 2026 · 10 citations
- A Regret Minimization Framework on Preference Learning in Large Language ModelsSuhwan Kim, Taehyun Cho, Youngsoo Jang, Geon-Hyeong Kim et al.ICML 2026
- Empowering LLM Tool Invocation with Tool-call Reward ModelDa Ma, Ziyue Yang, Hongshen Xu, Haotian Fang et al.ICLR 2026
- ReflectRM: Boosting Generative Reward Models via Self-Reflection within a Unified Judgment FrameworkKai Qin, Liangxin Liu, Yu Liang, Longzheng Wang et al.ACL 2026
- Unlocking the Power of Multi-Agent LLM for Reasoning: From Lazy Agents to DeliberationZhiwei Zhang, Xiaomin Li, Yudi Lin, Hui Liu et al.ICLR 2026 · 13 citations
