QuTracer: Mitigating Quantum Gate and Measurement Errors by Tracing Subsets of Qubits
Peiyi Li, Ji Liu, Alvin Gonzales, Zain H. Saleem, Huiyang Zhou, Paul D. Hovland
Abstract
Quantum error mitigation plays a crucial role in the current noisy-intermediate-scale-quantum (NISQ) era. As we advance towards achieving a practical quantum advantage in the near term, error mitigation emerges as an indispensable component. One notable prior work, Jigsaw, demonstrates that measurement crosstalk errors can be effectively mitigated by measuring subsets of qubits. Jigsaw operates by running multiple copies of the original circuit, each time measuring only a subset of qubits. The localized distributions yielded from measurement subsetting suffer from less crosstalk and are then used to update the global distribution, thereby achieving improved output fidelity.
Inspired by the idea of measurement subsetting, we propose QuTracer, a framework designed to mitigate both gate and measurement errors in subsets of qubits by tracing the states of qubit subsets throughout the computational process. In order to achieve this goal, we introduce a technique, qubit subsetting Pauli checks (QSPC), which utilizes circuit cutting and Pauli Check Sandwiching (PCS) to trace the qubit subsets distribution to mitigate errors. The QuTracer framework can be applied to various algorithms including, but not limited to, VQE, QAOA, quantum arithmetic circuits, QPE, and Hamiltonian simulations.
In our experiments, we perform both noisy simulations and real device experiments to demonstrate that QuTracer is scalable and significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art approaches.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 9c0ba4c9-b539-489f-a9e4-de13c6d85f57Builds on3
- ADAPT: Mitigating Idling Errors in Qubits via Adaptive Dynamical DecouplingPoulami Das, Swamit S. Tannu, Siddharth Dangwal, Moinuddin K. QureshiMICRO 2021 · 64 citations
- JigSaw: Boosting Fidelity of NISQ Programs via Measurement SubsettingPoulami Das, Swamit S. Tannu, Moinuddin K. QureshiMICRO 2021 · 37 citations
- VarSaw: Application-tailored Measurement Error Mitigation for Variational Quantum AlgorithmsSiddharth Dangwal, Gokul Subramanian Ravi, Poulami Das, Kaitlin N. Smith et al.ASPLOS 2023 · 12 citations
Related papers
- Software Mitigation of Crosstalk on Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum ComputersPrakash Murali, David C. McKay, Margaret Martonosi, Ali Javadi-AbhariASPLOS 2020 · 253 citations
- Navigating the Dynamic Noise Landscape of Variational Quantum Algorithms with QISMETGokul Subramanian Ravi, Kaitlin N. Smith, Jonathan M. Baker, Tejas Kannan et al.ASPLOS 2023 · 16 citations
- SpREM: Exploiting Hamming Sparsity for Fast Quantum Readout Error MitigationHanyu Zhang, Liqiang Lu, Siwei Tan, Size Zheng et al.DAC 2024 · 2 citations
- Mitigating Coupling Map Constrained Correlated Measurement Errors on Quantum DevicesAlan Robertson, Shuaiwen SongSC 2023
- Qraft: reverse your Quantum circuit and know the correct program outputTirthak Patel, Devesh TiwariASPLOS 2021 · 44 citations
