Inlier-Centric Post-Training Quantization for Object Detection Models
Minsu Kim, Dongyeun Lee, Jaemyung Yu, Jiwan Hur, Giseop Kim, Junmo Kim
Abstract
Object detection is pivotal in computer vision, yet its immense computational demands make deployment slow and power-hungry, motivating quantization. However, task-irrelevant morphologies such as background clutter and sensor noise induce redundant activations (or anomalies). These anomalies expand activation ranges and skew activation distributions toward task-irrelevant responses, complicating bit allocation and weakening the preservation of informative features. Without a clear criterion to distinguish anomalies, suppressing them can inadvertently discard useful information. To address this, we present InlierQ, an inlier-centric post-training quantization approach that separates anomalies from informative inliers. InlierQ computes gradient-aware volume saliency scores, classifies each volume as an inlier or anomaly, and fits a posterior distribution over these scores using the Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm. This design suppresses anomalies while preserving informative features. InlierQ is label-free, drop-in, and requires only 64 calibration samples. Experiments on the COCO and nuScenes benchmarks show consistent reductions in quantization error for camera-based (2D and 3D) and LiDAR-based (3D) object detection.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 9bde7d07-bf24-43bc-bbe8-8fe804a9b475Builds on11
- CenterNet: Keypoint Triplets for Object DetectionKaiwen Duan, Song Bai, Lingxi Xie, Honggang Qi et al.ICCV 2019 · 3,348 citations
- SmoothQuant: Accurate and Efficient Post-Training Quantization for Large Language ModelsGuangxuan Xiao, Ji Lin, Mickaël Seznec, Hao Wu et al.ICML 2023 · 1,493 citations
- Up or Down? Adaptive Rounding for Post-Training QuantizationMarkus Nagel, Rana Ali Amjad, Mart van Baalen, Christos Louizos et al.ICML 2020 · 816 citations
- Data-Free Quantization Through Weight Equalization and Bias CorrectionMarkus Nagel, Mart van Baalen, Tijmen Blankevoort, Max WellingICCV 2019 · 622 citations
- Differentiable Soft Quantization: Bridging Full-Precision and Low-Bit Neural NetworksRuihao Gong, Xianglong Liu, Shenghu Jiang, Tianxiang Li et al.ICCV 2019 · 540 citations
Related papers
- Point4Bit: Post Training 4-bit Quantization for Point Cloud 3D DetectionJianyu Wang, Yu Wang, Shengjie Zhao, Sifan ZhouNeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- ImpQuant: Fine-Grained Importance-Aware Quantization for Large Vision-Language ModelsJundong Zhou, Tianao Cai, Yujie Huang, Xinbing Wang et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
- Ada3D : Exploiting the Spatial Redundancy with Adaptive Inference for Efficient 3D Object DetectionTianchen Zhao, Xuefei Ning, Ke Hong, Zhongyuan Qiu et al.ICCV 2023 · 23 citations
- LiDAR-PTQ: Post-Training Quantization for Point Cloud 3D Object DetectionSifan Zhou, Liang Li, Xinyu Zhang, Bo Zhang et al.ICLR 2024 · 40 citations
- Quant Experts: Token-aware Adaptive Error Reconstruction with Mixture of Experts for Large Vision-Language Models QuantizationChenwei Jia, Baoting Li, Xuchong Zhang, Mingzhuo Wei et al.CVPR 2026 · 3 citations
