Directed Graph Contrastive Learning
Zekun Tong, Yuxuan Liang, Henghui Ding, Yongxing Dai, Xinke Li, Changhu Wang
Abstract
Graph Contrastive Learning (GCL) has emerged to learn generalizable representations from contrastive views. However, it is still in its infancy with two concerns: 1) changing the graph structure through data augmentation to generate contrastive views may mislead the message passing scheme, as such graph changing action deprives the intrinsic graph structural information, especially the directional structure in directed graphs; 2) since GCL usually uses predefined contrastive views with hand-picking parameters, it does not take full advantage of the contrastive information provided by data augmentation, resulting in incomplete structure information for models learning. In this paper, we design a directed graph data augmentation method called Laplacian perturbation and theoretically analyze how it provides contrastive information without changing the directed graph structure. Moreover, we present a directed graph contrastive learning framework, which dynamically learns from all possible contrastive views generated by Laplacian perturbation. Then we train it using multi-task curriculum learning to progressively learn from multiple easy-to-difficult contrastive views. We empirically show that our model can retain more structural features of directed graphs than other GCL models because of its ability to provide complete contrastive information. Experiments on various benchmarks reveal our dominance over the state-of-the-art approaches.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 9b4cff9a-0130-4f53-a340-e471be754129Cited by top-tier papers15
- Graph Structure Learning with Variational Information BottleneckQingyun Sun, Jianxin Li, Hao Peng, Jia Wu et al.AAAI 2022 · 224 citations
- ProGCL: Rethinking Hard Negative Mining in Graph Contrastive LearningJun Xia, Lirong Wu, Ge Wang, Jintao Chen et al.ICML 2022 · 174 citations
- Contrast Everything: A Hierarchical Contrastive Framework for Medical Time-SeriesYihe Wang, Yu Han, Haishuai Wang, Xiang ZhangNeurIPS 2023 · 106 citations
- MA-GCL: Model Augmentation Tricks for Graph Contrastive LearningXumeng Gong, Cheng Yang, Chuan ShiAAAI 2023 · 68 citations
- Searching Large Neighborhoods for Integer Linear Programs with Contrastive LearningTaoan Huang, Aaron M. Ferber, Yuandong Tian, Bistra Dilkina et al.ICML 2023 · 45 citations
Builds on22
- A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual RepresentationsTing Chen, Simon Kornblith, Mohammad Norouzi, Geoffrey E. HintonICML 2020 · 24,064 citations
- Random Erasing Data AugmentationZhun Zhong, Liang Zheng, Guoliang Kang, Shaozi Li et al.AAAI 2020 · 4,134 citations
- Graph Contrastive Learning with AugmentationsYuning You, Tianlong Chen, Yongduo Sui, Ting Chen et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 3,042 citations
- Strategies for Pre-training Graph Neural NetworksWeihua Hu, Bowen Liu, Joseph Gomes, Marinka Zitnik et al.ICLR 2020 · 1,744 citations
- Contrastive Multi-View Representation Learning on GraphsKaveh Hassani, Amir Hosein Khas AhmadiICML 2020 · 1,663 citations
Related papers
- Randomized Schur Complement Views for Graph Contrastive LearningVignesh KothapalliICML 2023 · 3 citations
- Boosting Graph Contrastive Learning via Graph Contrastive SaliencyChunyu Wei, Yu Wang, Bing Bai, Kai Ni et al.ICML 2023 · 31 citations
- Graph Contrastive Learning with Adaptive AugmentationYanqiao Zhu, Yichen Xu, Feng Yu, Qiang Liu et al.WWW 2021 · 1,415 citations
- AutoGCL: Automated Graph Contrastive Learning via Learnable View GeneratorsYihang Yin, Qingzhong Wang, Siyu Huang, Haoyi Xiong et al.AAAI 2022 · 203 citations
- Uncovering Capabilities of Model Pruning in Graph Contrastive LearningJunran Wu, Xueyuan Chen, Shangzhe LiACM MM 2024 · 2 citations
