Attention Sink Forges Native MoE in Attention Layers: Sink-Aware Training to Address Head Collapse
Zizhuo Fu, Wenxuan Zeng, Runsheng Wang, Meng Li
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) often assign disproportionate attention to the first token, a phenomenon known as the attention sink. Several recent approaches aim to address this issue, including Sink Attention in GPT-OSS and Gated Attention in Qwen3-Next. However, a comprehensive analysis of the relationship among these attention mechanisms is lacking. In this work, we provide both theoretical and empirical evidence demonstrating that the sink in Vanilla Attention and Sink Attention naturally construct a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) mechanism within attention layers. This insight explains the head collapse phenomenon observed in prior work, where only a fixed subset of attention heads contributes to generation. To mitigate head collapse, we propose a sink-aware training algorithm with an auxiliary load balancing loss designed for attention layers. Extensive experiments show that our method achieves effective head load balancing and improves model performance across Vanilla Attention, Sink Attention, and Gated Attention. We hope this study offers a new perspective on attention mechanisms and encourages further exploration of the inherent MoE structure within attention layers.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 9b309174-1a3b-446c-972e-8f1713896bc3Builds on19
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- FlashAttention-2: Faster Attention with Better Parallelism and Work PartitioningTri DaoICLR 2024 · 2,600 citations
- Efficient Streaming Language Models with Attention SinksGuangxuan Xiao, Yuandong Tian, Beidi Chen, Song Han et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,714 citations
- Model Tells You What to Discard: Adaptive KV Cache Compression for LLMsSuyu Ge, Yunan Zhang, Liyuan Liu, Minjia Zhang et al.ICLR 2024 · 432 citations
- Gated Attention for Large Language Models: Non-linearity, Sparsity, and Attention-Sink-FreeZihan Qiu, Zekun Wang, Bo Zheng, Zeyu Huang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 336 citations
Related papers
- The Structural Origin of Attention Sink: Variance Discrepancy, Super Neurons, and Dimension DisparitySiquan Li, Kaiqi Jiang, Jiacheng Sun, Tianyang HuICML 2026 · 1 citation
- When Attention Sink Emerges in Language Models: An Empirical ViewXiangming Gu, Tianyu Pang, Chao Du, Qian Liu et al.ICLR 2025
- Unveiling Super Experts in Mixture-of-Experts Large Language ModelsZunhai Su, Qingyuan Li, HaoZhang, Weihao Ye et al.ICLR 2026 · 16 citations
- Advancing Expert Specialization for Better MoEHongcan Guo, Haolang Lu, Guoshun Nan, Bolun Chu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 48 citations
- Attention Sinks and Compression Valleys in LLMs are Two Sides of the Same CoinEnrique Queipo-de-Llano, Alvaro Arroyo, Federico Barbero, Xiaowen Dong et al.ICLR 2026 · 56 citations
