SalKG: Learning From Knowledge Graph Explanations for Commonsense Reasoning
Aaron Chan, Jiashu Xu, Boyuan Long, Soumya Sanyal, Tanishq Gupta, Xiang Ren
Abstract
Augmenting pre-trained language models with knowledge graphs (KGs) has achieved success on various commonsense reasoning tasks. However, for a given task instance, the KG, or certain parts of the KG, may not be useful. Although KG-augmented models often use attention to focus on specific KG components, the KG is still always used, and the attention mechanism is never explicitly taught which KG components should be used. Meanwhile, saliency methods can measure how much a KG feature (e.g., graph, node, path) influences the model to make the correct prediction, thus explaining which KG features are useful. This paper explores how saliency explanations can be used to improve KG-augmented models' performance. First, we propose to create coarse (Is the KG useful?) and fine (Which nodes/paths in the KG are useful?) saliency explanations. Second, to motivate saliency-based supervision, we analyze oracle KG-augmented models which directly use saliency explanations as extra inputs for guiding their attention. Third, we propose SalKG, a framework for KG-augmented models to learn from coarse and/or fine saliency explanations. Given saliency explanations created from a task's training set, SalKG jointly trains the model to predict the explanations, then solve the task by attending to KG features highlighted by the predicted explanations. On three commonsense QA benchmarks (CSQA, OBQA, CODAH) and a range of KG-augmented models, we show that SalKG can yield considerable performance gains -- up to 2.76% absolute improvement on CSQA.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 9b2cbda3-4e51-48b6-bb8b-ba7c4900ea84Cited by top-tier papers2
- PINTO: Faithful Language Reasoning Using Prompt-Generated RationalesPeifeng Wang, Aaron Chan, Filip Ilievski, Muhao Chen et al.ICLR 2023 · 21 citations
- Open Visual Knowledge Extraction via Relation-Oriented Multimodality Model PromptingHejie Cui, Xinyu Fang, Zihan Zhang, Ran Xu et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 6 citations
Builds on11
- ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language RepresentationsZhenzhong Lan, Mingda Chen, Sebastian Goodman, Kevin Gimpel et al.ICLR 2020 · 7,418 citations
- QASC: A Dataset for Question Answering via Sentence CompositionTushar Khot, Peter Clark, Michal Guerquin, Peter Jansen et al.AAAI 2020 · 387 citations
- Graph-Based Reasoning over Heterogeneous External Knowledge for Commonsense Question AnsweringShangwen Lv, Daya Guo, Jingjing Xu, Duyu Tang et al.AAAI 2020 · 224 citations
- KG-BART: Knowledge Graph-Augmented BART for Generative Commonsense ReasoningYe Liu, Yao Wan, Lifang He, Hao Peng et al.AAAI 2021 · 220 citations
- Scalable Multi-Hop Relational Reasoning for Knowledge-Aware Question AnsweringYanlin Feng, Xinyue Chen, Bill Yuchen Lin, Peifeng Wang et al.EMNLP 2020 · 207 citations
Related papers
- ACENet: Attention Guided Commonsense Reasoning on Hybrid Knowledge GraphChuzhan Hao, Minghui Xie, Peng ZhangEMNLP 2022 · 5 citations
- Dynamic Heterogeneous-Graph Reasoning with Language Models and Knowledge Representation Learning for Commonsense Question AnsweringYujie Wang, Hu Zhang, Jiye Liang, Ru LiACL 2023 · 14 citations
- Towards Faithful Knowledge Graph Explanation Through Deep Alignment in Commonsense Question AnsweringWeihe Zhai, Arkaitz Zubiaga, Bingquan Liu, Chengjie Sun et al.EMNLP 2024
- Learning to Deceive Knowledge Graph Augmented Models via Targeted PerturbationMrigank Raman, Aaron Chan, Siddhant Agarwal, Peifeng Wang et al.ICLR 2021 · 20 citations
- ProgRAG: Hallucination-Resistant Progressive Retrieval and Reasoning over Knowledge GraphsMinbae Park, Hyemin Yang, Jeonghyun Kim, Kunsoo Park et al.AAAI 2026
